» Articles » PMID: 36628157

Development of a Safety Protocol for Training and Using SARS-CoV-2 Detection Dogs: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Medical detection dogs have potential to be used to screen asymptomatic patients in crowded areas at risk of epidemics such as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, the fact that SARS-CoV-2 detection dogs are in direct contact with infected people or materials raises important concerns due to the zoonotic potential of the virus. No study has yet recommended a safety protocol to ensure the health of SARS- CoV-2 detection dogs during training and working in public areas. This study sought to identify suitable decontamination methods to obtain nonpathogenic face mask samples while working with SARS-CoV-2 detection dogs and to investigate whether dogs were able to adapt themselves to other decontamination procedures once they were trained for a specific odor. The present study was designed as a four-phase study: (a) Method development, (b) Testing of decon- tamination methods, (c) Testing of training methodology, and (d) Real life scenario. Surgical face masks were used as scent samples. In total, 3 dogs were trained. The practical use of 3 different decontam- ination procedures (storage, heating, and UV-C light) while training SARS-CoV-2 detection dogs were tested. The dog trained for the task alerted to the samples inactivated by the storage method with a sensitivity of100 % and specificity of 98.28 %. In the last phase of this study, one dog of 2 dogs trained, alerted to the samples inactivated by the UV-C light with a sensitivity of 91.30% and specificity of 97.16% while the other dog detected the sample with a sensitivity of 96.00% and specificity of 97.65 %.

Citing Articles

Is diagnostic performance of SARS-CoV-2 detection dogs reduced -due to virus variation- over the time?.

Ozgur-Buyukatalay E, Demirbas Y, Bozdayi G, Kismali G, Ilhan M Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2023; 258:105825.

PMID: 36589678 PMC: 9788989. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105825.


Expert considerations and consensus for using dogs to detect human SARS-CoV-2-infections.

Meller S, Al Khatri M, Alhammadi H, Alvarez G, Alvergnat G, Alves L Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:1015620.

PMID: 36569156 PMC: 9773891. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1015620.

References
1.
Williams C, Abdulwhhab M, Birring S, De Kock E, Garton N, Townsend E . Exhaled Mycobacterium tuberculosis output and detection of subclinical disease by face-mask sampling: prospective observational studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(5):607-617. PMC: 7191268. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30707-8. View

2.
Oude Munnink B, Sikkema R, Nieuwenhuijse D, Molenaar R, Munger E, Molenkamp R . Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans. Science. 2020; 371(6525):172-177. PMC: 7857398. DOI: 10.1126/science.abe5901. View

3.
de Souza Barbosa A, Kmetiuk L, de Carvalho O, Brandao A, Doline F, Lopes S . Infection of SARS-CoV-2 in domestic dogs associated with owner viral load. Res Vet Sci. 2022; 153:61-65. PMC: 9556808. DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.10.006. View

4.
Jendrny P, Twele F, Meller S, Schulz C, von Kockritz-Blickwede M, Osterhaus A . Scent dog identification of SARS-CoV-2 infections in different body fluids. BMC Infect Dis. 2021; 21(1):707. PMC: 8313882. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06411-1. View

5.
Sia S, Yan L, Chin A, Fung K, Choy K, Wong A . Pathogenesis and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in golden hamsters. Nature. 2020; 583(7818):834-838. PMC: 7394720. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2342-5. View