» Articles » PMID: 36627870

Clinical and Economic Benefits of a New Paradigm of HCV Diagnosis and Treatment

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 Jan 11
PMID 36627870
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The current paradigm (CP) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) diagnosis and treatment in Italy's National Health Service system has numerous steps. The European Association for the Study of the Liver recommends initiation of a pan-genotypic direct-acting antiviral regimen after a simple diagnostic process. The present study estimated the efficiency gains resulting from two simplified pathways from diagnosis to treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients in Italy over the next 5 years from a societal perspective.

Methods: The CP, a New Paradigm 1 (NP1), and a New Paradigm 2 (NP2) were evaluated in a Markov model. The NP1 model simplifies monitoring and laboratory test requirements in the diagnosis and treatment phases. The NP2 model also eliminates the primary care referral requirement.

Results: Treatment process time for non-cirrhotic patients was 48, 43, and 25 weeks in the CP, NP1, and NP2, respectively, and in cirrhotic patients was 49, 46, and 37 weeks. Under the CP, 19% of patients/year would be lost to follow-up, which decreases by 11% in NP1 and 100% in NP2. Compared with the CP, implementation of NP1 at 5 years would reduce compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related deaths by 12.6%, 12.4%, 8.1%, and 8.8%, respectively; these cases would be reduced by 94.0%, 93.8%, 61.0%, and 58.4% in NP2. Total 5-year costs with the CP, NP1, and NP2 are estimated at 135.6€ million, 110.5€ million, and 80.5€ million, respectively.

Conclusions: Simplification of HCV diagnosis and monitoring requirements would allow Italy to move closer to international guidelines with significant health benefits and economic gains.

References
1.
Cenderello G, Artioli S, Viscoli C, Pasa A, Giacomini M, Giannini B . Budget impact analysis of sofosbuvir-based regimens for the treatment of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients in northern Italy: a multicenter regional simulation. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016; 8:15-21. PMC: 4706121. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S93641. View

2.
Buggisch P, Wursthorn K, Stoehr A, Atanasov P, Supiot R, Lee J . Real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir hepatitis C treatment in a single centre in Germany. PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0214795. PMC: 6448908. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214795. View

3.
Wiessing L, Ferri M, Grady B, Kantzanou M, Sperle I, Cullen K . Hepatitis C virus infection epidemiology among people who inject drugs in Europe: a systematic review of data for scaling up treatment and prevention. PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e103345. PMC: 4113410. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103345. View

4.
DiBonaventura M, Yuan Y, Lescrauwaet B, LItalien G, Liu G, Kamae I . Multicountry burden of chronic hepatitis C viral infection among those aware of their diagnosis: a patient survey. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e86070. PMC: 3897615. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086070. View

5.
Ruggeri M, Romano F, Basile M, Coretti S, Rolli F, Drago C . Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Early Treatment of Chronic HCV with Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in Italy. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018; 16(5):711-722. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-018-0410-x. View