Acupuncture and Related Therapies for the Anxiety and Depression in Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D): A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: A growing number of clinical studies have suggested the value of acupuncture-related therapies for patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D), and the patient's mental state plays an important role, but there are many types of acupuncture-related therapies involved. This study aimed to evaluate the mental status, efficacy and safety of the different acupuncture-related therapies for IBS-D patients.
Methods: We searched seven databases to collect randomized controlled trials of acupuncture-related therapies for IBS-D. After independent literature screening and data extraction, the quality of the final included literature was evaluated. Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAMA), hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS) was used as the primary outcome indicator. And the network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed by using Revman 5.4, Stata 15.0 and WinBUGS 1.4.3 software, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve was conducted to rank the included interventions.
Results: We analyzed 24 eligible studies with 1,885 patients, involving eight types of acupuncture and related therapies along with comprehensive therapies. The NMA result shows that: for SAS scores, combined therapies were more efficacious than anti-diarrheal or antispasmodic (western medicine, WM) (SMD: -8.92; 95% CI: -15.30, -2.47); for SDS scores, combined therapies were more efficacious than WM (SMD: -8.45; 95% CI: -15.50, -1.41). For HAMA scores, moxibustion (MOX) was more efficacious than placebo (SMD: -8.66; 95% CI: -16.64, -0.38). For HAMD scores, MOX was more efficacious than all other included interventions. For response rate, MOX was more efficacious than the following interventions: acupuncture (ACU) (SMD:0.29; 95% CI:0.08,0.93), Chinese herb medicine (CH) (SMD:0.09; 95% CI:0.02,0.36), combined therapies (SMD:0.23; 95% CI:0.06, 0.85), electroacupuncture (EA) (SMD:0.06; 95% CI:0.01,0.33), warm acupuncture (WA) (SMD:22.16; 95% CI:3.53,148.10), WM (SMD:15.59; 95% CI:4.68,61.21), and placebo (SMD:9.80; 95% CI:2.90,45.51). Combined therapies were more efficacious than the following interventions: CH (SMD:0.39; 95% CI:0.19,0.80), WA (SMD:4.96; 95% CI:1.30,21.62), and WM (SMD:3.62; 95% CI:2.35,5.66). The comprehensive ranking results show that MOX, ACU, combined therapies, and EA had high SUCRA rankings involving different outcome indicators.
Conclusion: MOX, ACU, combined therapies, and EA better alleviate anxiety and depression among IBS-D patients, and with a higher safety level, may be the optimal therapies. In addition, combining acupuncture-related treatments and other therapies also delivers a higher global benefit level.
Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/], identifier [CRD42022364560].
Zhou J, Lamichhane N, Xu Z, Wang J, Quynh V, Huang J PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0314678.
PMID: 39946356 PMC: 11824959. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314678.
Asal M, El-Sayed A, Alsenany S, Ramzy Z, Dawood R BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):106.
PMID: 39875940 PMC: 11776273. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02594-5.
Li L, Wan A, Zhao M, Yu L, Han Y, Mi K Pak J Med Sci. 2025; 41(1):205-209.
PMID: 39867783 PMC: 11755288. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.41.1.9835.
Zhao J, Zheng H, Wang X, Wang X, Shi Y, Xie C Front Med. 2024; 18(4):678-689.
PMID: 38958923 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-024-1073-7.
Neural circuit mechanisms of acupuncture effect: where are we now?.
Wang X, Wang J, Han R, Yu C, Shen F Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1399925.
PMID: 38938783 PMC: 11208484. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1399925.