Real-world Effectiveness of Digital and Group-based Lifestyle Interventions As Compared with Usual Care to Reduce Type 2 Diabetes Risk - A Stop Diabetes Pragmatic Randomised Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: No real-world randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have explored the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions based on multiple behaviour change theories and using combined digital and group-based face-to-face delivery to improve risk factors for type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods: We conducted a one-year, multi-centre, unblinded, pragmatic RCT in primary healthcare using the habit formation, self-determination, and self-regulation theories among 2907 adults aged 18-74 years at increased T2D risk randomised into a digital lifestyle intervention group (DIGI, = 967), a combined digital and group-based lifestyle intervention group (DIGI+GROUP, = 971), and a control group receiving usual care (CONTROL, = 969). We collected data on primary outcomes (diet quality by Healthy Diet Index [HDI], physical activity, body weight, fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose) and secondary outcomes (sedentary time, waist circumference, fasting plasma insulin) using digital questionnaires, clinical examinations, fasting blood tests, and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance tests. Main statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, sex, and province. This RCT was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03156478.
Findings: The 2907 participants assigned were recruited between March 1, 2017, and February 28, 2018. Diet quality improved more (3·2 vs. 1·4 HDI points, p<0·001 for difference between groups, '<0·001 for group*time interaction) and waist circumference tended to decrease more (-1·8 vs. -1·3 cm, = 0·028, ' = 0·068) in DIGI+GROUP than in CONTROL. Fasting insulin tended to increase in CONTROL but not in DIGI (1·0 vs. 0·0 mU/L, = 0·033, ' = 0·054) or in DIGI+GROUP (1·0 vs. 0·5 mU/L, = 0·042, ' = 0·054). Good adherence to DIGI and DIGI+GROUP (≥median of 501 habits/year in DIGI, ≥5 of all 6 sessions in GROUP) was associated with improved diet quality and good adherence to DIGI with increased physical activity and decreased sedentary time.
Interpretation: A lifestyle intervention based on multiple behaviour change theories and combined digital and group-based face-to-face delivery improves diet quality and tends to decrease abdominal adiposity and prevent an increase in insulin resistance. Good adherence improves the results of the interventions.
Funding: Strategic Research Council at Academy of Finland, Academy of Finland, Novo Nordisk Foundation, and Finnish Diabetes Research foundation.
Teoh K, Ng C, Chong C, Cheong W, Ng Y, Bell J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e083921.
PMID: 39448216 PMC: 11579589. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083921.
Rantala E, Vanhatalo S, Valtanen M, Lindstrom J, Pihlajamaki J, Poutanen K BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):939.
PMID: 38561724 PMC: 10986070. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18482-1.
Acceptability of workplace choice architecture modification for healthy behaviours.
Rantala E, Vanhatalo S, Perez-Cueto F, Pihlajamaki J, Poutanen K, Karhunen L BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):2451.
PMID: 38062407 PMC: 10704714. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17331-x.
Al-Rawaf H, Gabr S, Alghadir A Heliyon. 2023; 9(11):e22020.
PMID: 38027999 PMC: 10665742. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22020.
Type 2 diabetes prevention goes digital.
Samarasinghe S, Miras A Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023; 24:100538.
PMID: 36643659 PMC: 9832270. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100538.