» Articles » PMID: 36620161

Comparison of Left Ventricular Global and Segmental Strain Parameters by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Tissue Tracking in Light-chain Cardiac Amyloidosis and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Jan 9
PMID 36620161
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Apical sparing of left ventricular (LV) strain can occur in light-chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL-CA). We employed indicators of the strain ratio of the apex to base (RAB) and the relative apical sparing of strain (RAS) on the basis of LV global and segmental strain to distinguish AL-CA from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

Methods: In all, 36 AL-CA patients, 37 HCM patients, and 36 healthy controls underwent 3.0 T cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination. We compared LV strain parameters from CMR tissue tracking (CMR-TT), including global and segmental peak radial strain (PRS), peak circumferential strain (PCS), and peak longitudinal strain (PLS); the peak systolic strain rate in radial, circumferential, and longitudinal directions (PSSR_R, PSSR_C, PSSR_L); and the peak diastolic strain rate in radial, circumferential, and longitudinal directions (PDSR_R, PDSR_C, PDSR_L). We also assessed the values of RAB and RAS. Differences in all groups were compared using an independent t-test and a nonparametric rank sum test.

Results: In the comparison of global strain parameters, all the peak strain, systolic, and diastolic peak strain rates of the AL-CA group significantly decreased compared with those of the HCM and healthy control groups (all P<0.001). The values of PSSR in all directions were lower in the AL-CA than in the HCM patients (PSSR_R, P<0.001; PSSR_C, P=0.004; PSSR_L, P=0.010) . In the analysis of segmental strain parameters, all peak strains in the basal segment showed significant differences between the AL-CA and HCM groups (all P<0.001). Some strain rate parameters in the basal segment were also noted to be significantly different (PSSR_R, P<0.001; PSSR_L, P<0.001; PDSR_R, P=0.015; PDSR_C, P=0.020). Both the RAB and RAS of peak strain in all directions showed significant differences between the AL-CA and HCM groups (all P<0.001). The RAB of the radial and circumferential PSSR showed statistical differences between the 2 groups (P<0.001 and P=0.001). The RAS in the radial direction of both the PSSR and PDSR was statistically different (P=0.003 and P=0.012).

Conclusions: The CMR-TT technique can be used to quantitatively compare global and segmental strain differences between AL-CA and HCM. In addition, RAB and RAS are reliable parameters for assessing the apical sparing pattern and thus, for distinguishing AL-CA from HCM.

Citing Articles

Cardiac Functional Assessment by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Jiang M, Lu M, Zhao S Cardiol Discov. 2024; 4(4):284-299.

PMID: 39677505 PMC: 11637579. DOI: 10.1097/CD9.0000000000000141.


Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Myocardial Strain Parameters Derived from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking Technique in Light-Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis Patients: A Pilot Study.

Nai R, Liu J, Zhao K, Ma S, Ma W, He J Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(11):400.

PMID: 39618870 PMC: 11607509. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2511400.


Diagnostic efficacy of complexity metrics from cardiac MRI myocardial segmental motion curves in detecting late gadolinium enhancement in myocardial infarction patients.

Li G, Zheng C, Cui Y, Si J, Yang Y, Li J Heliyon. 2024; 10(11):e31889.

PMID: 38912500 PMC: 11190533. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31889.


Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction via cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking.

Kong H, Cao J, Tian J, Yong J, An J, Zhang L Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(10):7281-7293.

PMID: 37869269 PMC: 10585554. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-47.


Impaired cardiac pump function assessment with normalized cardiac power using cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Li Q, Gao X, Zhou Z, Zhang H, Li W, Gao Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(7):4103-4116.

PMID: 37456301 PMC: 10347308. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-1119.

References
1.
Liu H, Bai P, Xu H, Li Z, Xia C, Zhou X . Distinguishing Cardiac Amyloidosis and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy by Thickness and Myocardial Deformation of the Right Ventricle. Cardiol Res Pract. 2022; 2022:4364279. PMC: 8825671. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4364279. View

2.
Fikrle M, Palecek T, Marek J, Kuchynka P, Linhart A . Simplified apical four-chamber view evaluation of relative apical sparing of longitudinal strain in diagnosing AL amyloid cardiomyopathy. Echocardiography. 2018; 35(11):1764-1771. DOI: 10.1111/echo.14132. View

3.
Gertz M, Comenzo R, Falk R, Fermand J, Hazenberg B, Hawkins P . Definition of organ involvement and treatment response in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): a consensus opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis, Tours, France, 18-22 April 2004. Am J Hematol. 2005; 79(4):319-28. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.20381. View

4.
Ibrahim E . Myocardial tagging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: evolution of techniques--pulse sequences, analysis algorithms, and applications. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011; 13:36. PMC: 3166900. DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-36. View

5.
Pandey T, Alapati S, Wadhwa V, Edupuganti M, Gurram P, Lensing S . Evaluation of Myocardial Strain in Patients With Amyloidosis Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2017; 46(4):288-294. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.11.008. View