» Articles » PMID: 36619643

Burden, Satisfaction Caregiving, and Family Relations in Informal Caregivers of Older Adults

Abstract

Introduction: Family caregivers of older persons devote much of their time and energy to caring for another person. This exposure may burden caregivers and compromise their health and quality of life.

Objective: To investigate the relationship between burden, sociodemographic, caregiving, and health characteristics of informal caregivers of dependent older adults.

Methods: Cross-sectional and analytical study carried out in Palmas, Tocantins, Brazil, with 52 informal caregivers of older persons who need full-time help for basic living activities. Caregivers' burden was assessed by Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Data were analyzed using a -test, Pearson's correlation, and Multiple Linear Regression.

Results: The ZBI mean score of caregivers was 26.3 points (SD = 14.6; min = 0; max = 68). Burden scores were higher among caregivers who did not receive help from other people in care ( = 0.016), reported family dysfunction ( = 0.001), and had depression symptoms ( = 0.007). A correlation was found between the scores of burdens and satisfaction with care ( = 0.76; < 0.001) and perceived material support ( = -0.30; = 0.40). Satisfaction with care (β: 0.61; < 0.001) and family dysfunction (β: 8.07; = 0.033) were significantly associated with the burden score.

Conclusion: Caregivers with dysfunctional families and satisfaction with the care presented the highest-burden scores. The findings reveal the need for strategies to facilitate mediation and reduce caregiver burden by strengthening the family network support or providing professional assistance.

Citing Articles

Caregiving burden, social support, and psychological well-being among family caregivers of older Italians: a cross-sectional study.

Bongelli R, Busilacchi G, Pacifico A, Fabiani M, Guarascio C, Sofritti F Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1474967.

PMID: 39507659 PMC: 11537916. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1474967.


Perceptions of Stress and Engagement in High-Intensity Caregiving: A Cross-Sectional Study in Lithuania.

Jaruseviciene L, Zaborskis A, Blazeviciene A, Valius L, Kontrimiene A Inquiry. 2024; 61:469580241290081.

PMID: 39497624 PMC: 11536479. DOI: 10.1177/00469580241290081.


The Impact of Caregiving on Informal Caregivers of People with Dementia: Family Functioning, Burden, and Burnout.

Brites R, Brandao T, Nunes O, Hipolito J, Pires C J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024; .

PMID: 39453588 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-024-10052-2.


The moderating effect of care time on care-related characteristics and caregiver burden: differences between formal and informal caregivers of dependent older adults.

Oh E, Moon S, Chung D, Choi R, Hong G Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1354263.

PMID: 38638476 PMC: 11024244. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1354263.

References
1.
Abulaiti B, Zhang X, Guan T, Wang M, Jia S, Wang A . The dyadic care experiences of elderly individuals with disabilities and caregivers in the home setting from the perspective of family resilience: A qualitative study. Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:963101. PMC: 9606749. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.963101. View

2.
Diniz M, Melo B, Neri K, Casemiro F, Figueiredo L, Gaioli C . Comparative study between formal and informal caregivers of older adults. Cien Saude Colet. 2018; 23(11):3789-3798. DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320182311.16932016. View

3.
Dias R, Santos R, de Sousa M, Nogueira M, Torres B, Belfort T . Resilience of caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review of biological and psychosocial determinants. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2015; 37(1):12-9. DOI: 10.1590/2237-6089-2014-0032. View

4.
Jawahir S, Tan E, Tan Y, Mohd Noh S, Ab Rahim I . The impacts of caregiving intensity on informal caregivers in Malaysia: findings from a national survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):391. PMC: 8077883. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06412-5. View

5.
Griep R, Chor D, Faerstein E, Werneck G, Lopes C . [Construct validity of the Medical Outcomes Study's social support scale adapted to Portuguese in the Pró-Saúde Study]. Cad Saude Publica. 2005; 21(3):703-14. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2005000300004. View