» Articles » PMID: 36618916

Flecainide and Risk of Skin Neoplasms: Results of a Large Nested Case-control Study in Spain and Denmark

Abstract

A previous study in Denmark suggested an increased melanoma risk associated with the use of flecainide. To study the association between flecainide use and the risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in Spain and Denmark. We conducted a multi-database case-control study in (database/study period) Spain (SIDIAP/2005-2017 and BIFAP/2007-2017) and Denmark (Danish registries/2001-2018). We included incident cases of melanoma or non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) aged ≥18 with ≥2 years of previous data (≥10 years for Denmark) before the skin cancer and matched them to controls (10:1 by age and sex). We excluded persons with immunosuppression or previous cancer. We defined ever-use as any prescription fill and high-use as a cumulative dose of at least 200 g (reference: never-use). We categorized a cumulative dose for a dose-response assessment. We used conditional logistic regression to compute ORs (95% CI) adjusted for photosensitizing, anti-neoplastic, disease-specific drugs and comorbidities. The total numbers of melanoma/NMSC cases included were 7,809/64,230 in SIDIAP, 4,661/31,063 in BIFAP, and 27,978/152,821 in Denmark. In Denmark, high-use of flecainide was associated with increased adjusted ORs of skin cancer compared with never-use [melanoma: OR 1.97 (1.38-2.81); NMSC: OR 1.34 (1.15-1.56)]. In Spain, an association between high-use of flecainide and NMSC was also observed [BIFAP: OR 1.42 (1.04-1.93); SIDIAP: OR 1.19 (0.95-1.48)]. There was a non-significant dose-response pattern for melanoma in Denmark and no apparent dose-response pattern for NMSC in any of the three databases. We found similar results for ever-use of flecainide. Flecainide use was associated with an increased risk of melanoma (Denmark only) and NMSC (Denmark and Spain) but without substantial evidence of dose-response patterns. Further studies are needed to assess for possible unmeasured confounders.

References
1.
Monk B . Basal cell carcinoma following amiodarone therapy. Br J Dermatol. 1995; 133(1):148-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb02515.x. View

2.
Dominguez-Berjon M, Borrell C, Cano-Serral G, Esnaola S, Nolasco A, Pasarin M . [Constructing a deprivation index based on census data in large Spanish cities(the MEDEA project)]. Gac Sanit. 2008; 22(3):179-87. DOI: 10.1157/13123961. View

3.
Thygesen L, Daasnes C, Thaulow I, Bronnum-Hansen H . Introduction to Danish (nationwide) registers on health and social issues: structure, access, legislation, and archiving. Scand J Public Health. 2011; 39(7 Suppl):12-6. DOI: 10.1177/1403494811399956. View

4.
Macia-Martinez M, Gil M, Huerta C, Martin-Merino E, Alvarez A, Bryant V . Base de Datos para la Investigación Farmacoepidemiológica en Atención Primaria (BIFAP): A data resource for pharmacoepidemiology in Spain. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020; 29(10):1236-1245. DOI: 10.1002/pds.5006. View

5.
Pottegard A, Friis S, Christensen R, Habel L, Gagne J, Hallas J . Identification of Associations Between Prescribed Medications and Cancer: A Nationwide Screening Study. EBioMedicine. 2016; 7:73-9. PMC: 4909325. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.03.018. View