» Articles » PMID: 36613937

Acute Severe Heart Failure Reduces Heart Rate Variability: An Experimental Study in a Porcine Model

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Jan 8
PMID 36613937
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There are substantial differences in autonomic nervous system activation among heart (cardiac) failure (CF) patients. The effect of acute CF on autonomic function has not been well explored. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of experimental acute CF on heart rate variability (HRV). Twenty-four female pigs with a mean body weight of 45 kg were used. Acute severe CF was induced by global myocardial hypoxia. In each subject, two 5-min electrocardiogram segments were analyzed and compared: before the induction of myocardial hypoxia and >60 min after the development of severe CF. HRV was assessed by time-domain, frequency-domain and nonlinear analytic methods. The induction of acute CF led to a significant decrease in cardiac output, left ventricular ejection fraction and an increase in heart rate. The development of acute CF was associated with a significant reduction in the standard deviation of intervals between normal beats (50.8 [20.5−88.1] ms versus 5.9 [2.4−11.7] ms, p < 0.001). Uniform HRV reduction was also observed in other time-domain and major nonlinear analytic methods. Similarly, frequency-domain HRV parameters were significantly changed. Acute severe CF induced by global myocardial hypoxia is associated with a significant reduction in HRV.

Citing Articles

The pig as an optimal animal model for cardiovascular research.

Jia H, Chang Y, Song J Lab Anim (NY). 2024; 53(6):136-147.

PMID: 38773343 DOI: 10.1038/s41684-024-01377-4.


Interactive Cardio System for Healthcare Improvement.

Georgieva-Tsaneva G Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(3).

PMID: 36772226 PMC: 9921847. DOI: 10.3390/s23031186.

References
1.
Ostadal P, Mlcek M, Kruger A, Hala P, Lacko S, Mates M . Increasing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation flow negatively affects left ventricular performance in a porcine model of cardiogenic shock. J Transl Med. 2015; 13:266. PMC: 4537539. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-015-0634-6. View

2.
de Geus E, Gianaros P, Brindle R, Jennings J, Berntson G . Should heart rate variability be "corrected" for heart rate? Biological, quantitative, and interpretive considerations. Psychophysiology. 2018; 56(2):e13287. PMC: 6378407. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13287. View

3.
Koenig J, Thayer J . Sex differences in healthy human heart rate variability: A meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 64:288-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.007. View

4.
Taylor J, Carr D, MYERS C, Eckberg D . Mechanisms underlying very-low-frequency RR-interval oscillations in humans. Circulation. 1998; 98(6):547-55. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.98.6.547. View

5.
. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996; 17(3):354-81. View