» Articles » PMID: 36612595

Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Jan 8
PMID 36612595
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures have been used for estimating utility value, which is then used for calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). HRQoL measures may not capture many of the relevant and important non-health aspects of quality of life. The well-being of older people (WOOP) instrument was first developed in the Netherlands. This study aimed to validate this new instrument among older people in China. WOOP was first translated into simplified Chinese (for use in Mainland China) by two experienced translators. From July to August 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted on a convenience sample of 500 older people in Southwestern China. Older people who provided consent reported their demographic information and completed the simplified Chinese version of the WOOP instrument using a pencil and paper. The feasibility of WOOP was determined by the percentage of missing responses. Then, using the data without any missing responses, we examined the item response distributions, pairwise Spearman correlations, underlying factors, and known-group validity of WOOP. Among the nine items of WOOP, three had more than 10% missing responses. The response distributions of the nine items were overall good without signs of ceiling and floor effects. The correlations among the WOOP items were low. A two-factor exploratory factor analysis model suggested that the WOOP items can be categorized into either internal or external well-being items. Good known-group validity results were found. Some WOOP items may not be easily understood by a small proportion of rural residents. However, other results have suggested WOOP to be a valid instrument for measuring the well-being of the elderly in China. The availability of WOOP enables the measurement of well-being-related utility.

Citing Articles

Utilizing regression model to characterize the impact of urban green space features on the subjective well-being of older adults.

Xu T, Aini A, Nordin N Heliyon. 2024; 10(15):e35567.

PMID: 39170473 PMC: 11336737. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35567.

References
1.
Feng Z, Liu C, Guan X, Mor V . China's rapidly aging population creates policy challenges in shaping a viable long-term care system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31(12):2764-73. PMC: 3711106. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0535. View

2.
Karimi M, Brazier J . Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016; 34(7):645-9. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9. View

3.
Gamst-Klaussen T, Chen G, Lamu A, Olsen J . Health state utility instruments compared: inquiring into nonlinearity across EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI-3 and 15D. Qual Life Res. 2015; 25(7):1667-78. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1212-3. View

4.
Xu R, Keetharuth A, Wang L, Cheung A, Wong E . Measuring health-related quality of life and well-being: a head-to-head psychometric comparison of the EQ-5D-5L, ReQoL-UI and ICECAP-A. Eur J Health Econ. 2021; 23(2):165-176. PMC: 8327050. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01359-0. View

5.
Sun S, Chen J, Johannesson M, Kind P, Xu L, Zhang Y . Regional differences in health status in China: population health-related quality of life results from the National Health Services Survey 2008. Health Place. 2011; 17(2):671-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.01.007. View