Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound: From Diagnosis to Prognosis-A Rapid Review

Overview

Journal Diagnostics (Basel)

Specialty Radiology

Date 2023 Jan 8

PMID 36611350

Authors

Nicole Brunetti

Massimo Calabrese

Carlo Martinoli

Alberto Stefano Tagliafico

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound (US) is a fundamental diagnostic tool in breast imaging. However, US remains an operator-dependent examination. Research into and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in breast US are increasing. The aim of this rapid review was to assess the current development of US-based artificial intelligence in the field of breast cancer.

Methods: Two investigators with experience in medical research performed literature searching and data extraction on PubMed. The studies included in this rapid review evaluated the role of artificial intelligence concerning BC diagnosis, prognosis, molecular subtypes of breast cancer, axillary lymph node status, and the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were calculated for the main study categories with a meta-analytical approach.

Results: A total of 58 main studies, all published after 2017, were included. Only 9/58 studies were prospective (15.5%); 13/58 studies (22.4%) used an ML approach. The vast majority (77.6%) used DL systems. Most studies were conducted for the diagnosis or classification of BC (55.1%). At present, all the included studies showed that AI has excellent performance in breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment strategy.

Conclusions: US-based AI has great potential and research value in the field of breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. More prospective and multicenter studies are needed to assess the potential impact of AI in breast ultrasound.

Citing Articles

Comparative Study of AI Modes in Ultrasound Diagnosis of Breast Lesions.

Hong Y, Yu Z, Chou C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075807 PMC: 11898511. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050560.

Automated Analysis of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review.

Kossoff J, Duncan S, Acharya J, Davis D Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e72896.

PMID: 39618742 PMC: 11607776. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72896.

A Multi-label Artificial Intelligence Approach for Improving Breast Cancer Detection With Mammographic Image Analysis.

Park J, Lim J, Kim S, Heo J In Vivo. 2024; 38(6):2864-2872.

PMID: 39477432 PMC: 11535944. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13767.

Enhancing Breast Cancer Detection through Advanced AI-Driven Ultrasound Technology: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Vis-BUS.

Kwon H, Oh S, Kim M, Kim Y, Jung G, Lee H Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272652 PMC: 11394308. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14171867.

New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Imaging: The Rise of AI.

Shamir S, Sasson A, Margolies L, Mendelson D Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790318 PMC: 11117903. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050451.

References

Niu S, Huang J, Li J, Liu X, Wang D, Zhang R . Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A. BMC Cancer. 2020; 20(1):959. PMC: 7532640. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07413-z. View

DiCenzo D, Quiaoit K, Fatima K, Bhardwaj D, Sannachi L, Gangeh M . Quantitative ultrasound radiomics in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer: Results from multi-institutional study. Cancer Med. 2020; 9(16):5798-5806. PMC: 7433820. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3255. View

Zhou B, Wang L, Yin H, Wu T, Ren T, Peng C . Decoding the molecular subtypes of breast cancer seen on multimodal ultrasound images using an assembled convolutional neural network model: A prospective and multicentre study. EBioMedicine. 2021; 74:103684. PMC: 8599999. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103684. View

Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L, Fuchsjaeger M, Memarsadeghi M, Rudas M . US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology. 2008; 248(2):406-13. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482071994. View

Sun S, Mutasa S, Liu M, Nemer J, Sun M, Siddique M . Deep learning prediction of axillary lymph node status using ultrasound images. Comput Biol Med. 2022; 143:105250. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105250. View

Byra M, Galperin M, Ojeda-Fournier H, Olson L, OBoyle M, Comstock C . Breast mass classification in sonography with transfer learning using a deep convolutional neural network and color conversion. Med Phys. 2018; 46(2):746-755. PMC: 8544811. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13361. View

Yang L, Wang S, Zhang L, Sheng C, Song F, Wang P . Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2020; 20(1):499. PMC: 7268243. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06992-1. View

OConnell A, Bartolotta T, Orlando A, Jung S, Baek J, Parker K . Diagnostic Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System in Breast Ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2021; 41(1):97-105. DOI: 10.1002/jum.15684. View

Tahmasebi A, Qu E, Sevrukov A, Liu J, Wang S, Lyshchik A . Assessment of Axillary Lymph Nodes for Metastasis on Ultrasound Using Artificial Intelligence. Ultrason Imaging. 2021; 43(6):329-336. DOI: 10.1177/01617346211035315. View

10.

Shen Y, E Shamout F, Oliver J, Witowski J, Kannan K, Park J . Artificial intelligence system reduces false-positive findings in the interpretation of breast ultrasound exams. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):5645. PMC: 8463596. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26023-2. View

11.

Xiao T, Liu L, Li K, Qin W, Yu S, Li Z . Comparison of Transferred Deep Neural Networks in Ultrasonic Breast Masses Discrimination. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:4605191. PMC: 6033250. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4605191. View

12.

Ma M, Liu R, Wen C, Xu W, Xu Z, Wang S . Predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer and identifying interpretable imaging features using machine learning algorithms. Eur Radiol. 2021; 32(3):1652-1662. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08271-4. View

13.

Wang X, Cui L, Feng J, Chen W . Artificial intelligence for breast ultrasound: An adjunct tool to reduce excessive lesion biopsy. Eur J Radiol. 2021; 138:109624. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109624. View

14.

Li J, Bu Y, Lu S, Pang H, Luo C, Liu Y . Development of a Deep Learning-Based Model for Diagnosing Breast Nodules With Ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2020; 40(3):513-520. DOI: 10.1002/jum.15427. View

15.

Jiang M, Li C, Luo X, Chuan Z, Chen R, Tang S . Radiomics model based on shear-wave elastography in the assessment of axillary lymph node status in early-stage breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2021; 32(4):2313-2325. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08330-w. View

16.

Lyu S, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Zhang B, Gao L, Bai L . Diagnostic value of artificial intelligence automatic detection systems for breast BI-RADS 4 nodules. World J Clin Cases. 2022; 10(2):518-527. PMC: 8771370. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.518. View

17.

Gu Y, Xu W, Lin B, An X, Tian J, Ran H . Deep learning based on ultrasound images assists breast lesion diagnosis in China: a multicenter diagnostic study. Insights Imaging. 2022; 13(1):124. PMC: 9334487. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01259-8. View

18.

Gao Y, Liu B, Zhu Y, Chen L, Tan M, Xiao X . Detection and recognition of ultrasound breast nodules based on semi-supervised deep learning: a powerful alternative strategy. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021; 11(6):2265-2278. PMC: 8107344. DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-12b. View

19.

Hayashida T, Odani E, Kikuchi M, Nagayama A, Seki T, Takahashi M . Establishment of a deep-learning system to diagnose BI-RADS4a or higher using breast ultrasound for clinical application. Cancer Sci. 2022; 113(10):3528-3534. PMC: 9530860. DOI: 10.1111/cas.15511. View

20.

Gu J, Tong T, He C, Xu M, Yang X, Tian J . Deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography can predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer at an early stage of treatment: a prospective study. Eur Radiol. 2021; 32(3):2099-2109. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08293-y. View