» Articles » PMID: 36609944

Laser-assisted Hatching Improves Pregnancy Outcomes in Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles of Cleavage-stage Embryos: a Large Retrospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score Matching

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Jan 7
PMID 36609944
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Laser-assisted hatching (LAH) is a commonly used adjunct technique; however, its effectiveness has not been fully established.

Objective: We evaluated the effects of LAH on pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles of cleavage-stage embryos.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study involved 5779 FET cycles performed at the Reproductive and Genetic Center in the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2016 and December 2020. After propensity score matching, 3535 FET cycles were included, out of which 1238 were subjected to LAH while the remaining 2297 cycles were non-LAH (NLAH). The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) while secondary outcomes included implantation rate (IR), biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), ectopic pregnancy rate (EPR), pregnancy loss rate (PLR), multiple pregnancy rate (MPL), and monozygotic twinning rate (MTR). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to adjust for possible confounders. Subgroup analysis was also performed based on the endometrial preparation regimen.

Results: The LAH group exhibited a higher LBR, compared to the NLAH group (34.9% vs. 31.4%, OR = 1.185, 95% CI = 1.023, 1.374, P = 0.024). Additionally, the LAH group showed a decreasing trend in PLR and EPR; however, differences were insignificant (P = 0.078, P = 0.063 respectively). Differences in IR (24.6% vs. 24.3%), BPR (41.8% vs. 40.4%), CPR (40.7% vs. 38.3%), MPR (14.1% vs. 17.3%), and MTR (1.4% vs. 1.1%) were insignificant. Subgroup analysis revealed that LAH may be more conducive for pregnancy outcomes in hormone replacement cycles.

Conclusions: In summary, LAH has an increased chance of achieving live births. However, further prospective studies should be performed to confirm our findings.

Citing Articles

Human oocyte zona pellucida abnormalities: evaluation of clinical impact for different zona pellucida abnormalities and role of using assisted hatching.

Wang H, Yang G, Jiang R, Zhai J, Jin H, Song W J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 42(1):303-317.

PMID: 39520601 PMC: 11806172. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03306-3.


Unlocking the Potential of Assisted Hatching in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Narrative Review.

Deotalu S, More A, Karadbhajne P, Chaudhari K Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60736.

PMID: 38903279 PMC: 11187726. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60736.


Vitrification of human blastocysts for couples undergoing assisted reproduction: an updated review.

Sciorio R, Tramontano L, Campos G, Greco P, Mondrone G, Surbone A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1398049.

PMID: 38827525 PMC: 11140474. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1398049.


Two laser-assisted hatching methods of embryos in ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen K, Gao M, Wu Y, Hu Z, Tang L, Li M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):300.

PMID: 38649878 PMC: 11034172. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06380-8.


Mechanical Hatching as a Therapeutic Intervention for Improving Implantation Rate in a 32-Year-Old Female With Recurrent Implantation Failures: A Case Report.

Kakatikar R, Bawaskar P, Gajbe U, More A, Nair N Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e53709.

PMID: 38455805 PMC: 10918299. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53709.

References
1.
Cohen J, Malter H, Fehilly C, Wright G, Elsner C, Kort H . Implantation of embryos after partial opening of oocyte zona pellucida to facilitate sperm penetration. Lancet. 1988; 2(8603):162. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90710-6. View

2.
Elnahas A, Elnahas T, Azmy O, Elnoury A, Abdelhalim A, Aboelghar M . The use of laser assisted hatching of frozen/thawed embryos versus laser assisted hatching of fresh embryos in human intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 38(5):729. DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1444392. View

3.
Lacey L, Hassan S, Franik S, Seif M, Akhtar M . Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 3:CD001894. PMC: 8094760. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub6. View

4.
Ng C, Wais M, Nichols T, Garrow S, Hreinsson J, Luo Z . Assisted hatching of vitrified-warmed blastocysts prior to embryo transfer does not improve pregnancy outcomes. J Ovarian Res. 2020; 13(1):88. PMC: 7401203. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-020-00692-x. View

5.
Zhou H, Zao W, Zhang W, Shi J, Shi W . No adverse effects were identified on the perinatal outcomes after laser-assisted hatching treatment. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 29(6):692-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.08.011. View