» Articles » PMID: 36603021

The Combined Effect of Pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index and Gestational Weight Gain on the Risk of Pre-labour and Intrapartum Caesarean Section-The ICE-MCH Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Jan 5
PMID 36603021
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Women who are obese before pregnancy have a higher risk of caesarean section than normal weight women. We investigated the combined effect of pre-pregnancy weight and gestational weight gain on pre-labour and intrapartum caesarean section risk. We collected data on 22,763 singleton, term, live deliveries in 2003-2014 from the Icelandic Maternal and Child Health Study (ICE-MCH), based on Icelandic registries. These were the Icelandic Medical Birth Registry and the Saga Maternal and Child Health Database. Pre-pregnancy body mass index was categorised into underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese. Gestational weight gain was classified according to the Institute of Medicine´s recommendation into below, within and above the recommended range. Logistic regression models, adjusted for maternal and gestational characteristics, were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the risk of caesarean section. Obese women had a higher risk of pre-labour (AOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.34-1.81) and intrapartum caesarean section (AOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.70-2.17) than normal weight women in all categories of gestational weight gain. Gestational weight gain above the recommended range, compared to within the range, increased the risk of intrapartum caesarean section among normal weight (AOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23-1.73) and overweight women (AOR 1.291, 95% CI 1.04-1.60). Gestational weight gain below the recommended range, compared to within the range, increased the risk of pre-labour caesarean section (AOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20-2.25), but only among overweight women. Women who are obese before pregnancy have a high risk of caesarean section regardless of gestational weight gain. However, women who are normal weight or overweight before pregnancy and gain weight above the recommended range during pregnancy may also have an increased risk of caesarean section.

Citing Articles

Effects of pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in Poland.

Marchewka-Dlugonska J, Nieczuja-Dwojacka J, Krygowska K, Bogdanovich V, Sys D, Baranowska B Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7603.

PMID: 40038348 PMC: 11880542. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91879-z.


Effects of a Comprehensive Dietary Intervention Program, Promoting Nutrition Literacy, Eating Behavior, Dietary Quality, and Gestational Weight Gain in Chinese Urban Women with Normal Body Mass Index during Pregnancy.

Li Q, Piaseu N, Phumonsakul S, Thadakant S Nutrients. 2024; 16(2).

PMID: 38257110 PMC: 10820561. DOI: 10.3390/nu16020217.


Effect of the smartphone application on caesarean section in women with overweight and obesity: a randomized controlled trial in China.

Feng Y, Shi C, Zhang C, Yin C, Zhou L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):746.

PMID: 37872503 PMC: 10594860. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06004-7.

References
1.
Kominiarek M, VanVeldhuisen P, Hibbard J, Landy H, Haberman S, Learman L . The maternal body mass index: a strong association with delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203(3):264.e1-7. PMC: 2933947. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.024. View

2.
Dzakpasu S, Fahey J, Kirby R, Tough S, Chalmers B, Heaman M . Contribution of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain to caesarean birth in Canada. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:106. PMC: 3995143. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-106. View

3.
Hrolfsdottir L, Halldorsson T, Birgisdottir B, Hreidarsdottir I, Hardardottir H, Gunnarsdottir I . Development of a dietary screening questionnaire to predict excessive weight gain in pregnancy. Matern Child Nutr. 2018; 15(1):e12639. PMC: 6586038. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12639. View

4.
Bodner K, Wierrani F, Grunberger W, Bodner-Adler B . Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010; 283(6):1193-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1525-y. View

5.
Harris H, Ellison G . Practical approaches for estimating prepregnant body weight. J Nurse Midwifery. 1998; 43(2):97-101. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-2182(97)00159-6. View