A Qualitative Process Evaluation Within a Clinical Trial That Used Healthcare Technologies for Children with Asthma-insights and Implications

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2023 Jan 5

PMID 36603013

Authors

Louisa Lawrie

Stephen Turner

Seonaidh C Cotton

Jessica Wood

Heather M Morgan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Healthcare technologies are becoming more commonplace, however clinical and patient perspectives regarding the use of technology in the management of childhood asthma have yet to be investigated. Within a clinical trial of asthma management in children, we conducted a qualitative process evaluation that provided insights into the experiences and perspectives of healthcare staff and families on (i) the use of smart inhalers to monitor medication adherence and (ii) the use of algorithm generated treatment recommendations.

Methods: We interviewed trial staff (n = 15) and families (n = 6) who were involved in the trial to gauge perspectives around the use of smart inhalers to monitor adherence and the algorithm to guide clinical decision making.

Findings: Staff and families indicated that there were technical issues associated with the smart inhalers. While staff suggested that the smart inhalers were good for monitoring adherence and enabling communication regarding medication use, parents and children indicated that smart inhaler use increased motivation to adhere to medication and provided the patient (child) with a sense of responsibility for the management of their asthma. Staff were open-minded about the use of the algorithm to guide treatment recommendations, but some were not familiar with its' use in clinical care. There were some concerns expressed regarding treatment step-down decisions generated by the algorithm, and some staff highlighted the importance of using clinical judgement. Families perceived the algorithm to be a useful technology, but indicated that they felt comforted by the clinicians' own judgements.

Conclusion: The use of technology and individual data within appointments was considered useful to both staff and families: closer monitoring and the educational impacts were especially highlighted. Utilising an algorithm was broadly acceptable, with caveats around clinicians using the recommendations as a guide only and wariness around extreme step-ups/downs considering contextual factors not taken into account.

References

Gangadharan S, Tiyyagura G, Gawel M, Walsh B, Brown L, Lavoie M . A Grounded Theory Qualitative Analysis of Interprofessional Providers' Perceptions on Caring for Critically Ill Infants and Children in Pediatric and General Emergency Departments. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016; 34(8):578-583. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000906. View

Lupton D . Digital health now and in the future: Findings from a participatory design stakeholder workshop. Digit Health. 2018; 3:2055207617740018. PMC: 6001191. DOI: 10.1177/2055207617740018. View

Busse W, Kraft M . Current unmet needs and potential solutions to uncontrolled asthma. Eur Respir Rev. 2022; 31(163). PMC: 9488919. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0176-2021. View

Turner S, Cotton S, Emele C, Thomas R, Fielding S, Gaillard E . Reducing Asthma Attacks in Children using Exhaled Nitric Oxide as a biomarker to inform treatment strategy: a randomised trial (RAACENO). Trials. 2019; 20(1):573. PMC: 6778366. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3500-7. View

Getachew E, Woldeamanuel Y, Manyazewal T . Capacity and Readiness Assessment of Healthcare Facilities for Digital Health Interventions Against Tuberculosis and HIV in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Front Digit Health. 2022; 4:821390. PMC: 8918491. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.821390. View

Husain I, Spence D . Can healthy people benefit from health apps?. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1887. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1887. View

Morrison D, Wyke S, Agur K, Cameron E, Docking R, MacKenzie A . Digital asthma self-management interventions: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(2):e51. PMC: 3958674. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2814. View

Lennartz S, Dratsch T, Zopfs D, Persigehl T, Maintz D, Grosse Hokamp N . Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(2):e24221. PMC: 7929746. DOI: 10.2196/24221. View

Adams W, Fuhlbrigge A, Miller C, Panek C, Gi Y, Loane K . TLC-Asthma: an integrated information system for patient-centered monitoring, case management, and point-of-care decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2004; :1-5. PMC: 1480156. View

10.

Thomas B, Pugalenthi A . Currently Available Inhaled Therapies in Asthma and Advances in Drug Delivery and Devices. Indian J Pediatr. 2022; 89(4):387-394. DOI: 10.1007/s12098-021-03976-2. View

11.

Kan K, Shaunfield S, Kanaley M, Chadha A, Boon K, Morales L . Health provider perspectives of electronic medication monitoring in outpatient asthma care: a qualitative investigation using the consolidated framework for implementation research. J Asthma. 2020; 59(2):342-351. PMC: 8293497. DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1846745. View

12.

Baumgartner P, Comment N, Hersberger K, Arnet I . Development and testing of a framework for defining a strategy to address medication adherence during patient encounters in community pharmacies. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022; 5:100123. PMC: 9031683. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100123. View

13.

Nassar R, Basheti I, Saini B . Exploring Validated Self-Reported Instruments to Assess Adherence to Medications Used: A Review Comparing Existing Instruments. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022; 16:503-513. PMC: 8885149. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S352161. View

14.

Thompson C, Morgan H . Ethical barriers to artificial intelligence in the national health service, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Bull World Health Organ. 2020; 98(4):293-295. PMC: 7133482. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.19.237230. View

15.

Kercsmar C, Sorkness C, Calatroni A, Gergen P, Bloomberg G, Gruchalla R . A computerized decision support tool to implement asthma guidelines for children and adolescents. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018; 143(5):1760-1768. PMC: 6504600. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.10.060. View

16.

Ibrahim M, Yusoff H, Abu Bakar Y, Aung M, Abas M, Ramli R . Digital health for quality healthcare: A systematic mapping of review studies. Digit Health. 2022; 8:20552076221085810. PMC: 8943311. DOI: 10.1177/20552076221085810. View

17.

Morgan H . 'Pushed' self-tracking using digital technologies for chronic health condition management: a critical interpretive synthesis. Digit Health. 2018; 2:2055207616678498. PMC: 6001233. DOI: 10.1177/2055207616678498. View

18.

Ramsey R, Plevinsky J, Kollin S, Gibler R, Guilbert T, Hommel K . Systematic Review of Digital Interventions for Pediatric Asthma Management. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019; 8(4):1284-1293. PMC: 7152564. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.12.013. View

19.

Kan K, Shaunfield S, Kanaley M, Chadha A, Boon K, Foster C . Parent Experiences With Electronic Medication Monitoring in Pediatric Asthma Management: Qualitative Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021; 4(2):e25811. PMC: 8105758. DOI: 10.2196/25811. View

20.

Spray J, Hunleth J . Breathing Together: Children Co-constructing Asthma Self-Management in the United States. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2022; 47(2):301-328. PMC: 8821853. DOI: 10.1007/s11013-022-09766-5. View