The Evaluation of Web-Based Communication Interventions to Support Decisions About COVID-19 Vaccination Among Patients With Underlying Medical Conditions: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal JMIR Res Protoc

Publisher JMIR Publications

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Jan 4

PMID 36599054

Authors

Minjung Lee

Bumjo Oh

Nan-He Yoon

Shinkyeong Kim

Young-Il Jung

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The timeliness of raising vaccine acceptance and uptake among the public is essential to overcoming COVID-19; however, the decision-making process among patients with underlying medical conditions is complex, leading individuals to vaccine hesitancy because of their health status. Although vaccine implementation is more effective when deployed as soon as possible, vaccine hesitancy is a significant threat to the success of vaccination programs.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a communication tool for patients with underlying medical conditions who should decide whether to receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

Methods: This 3-arm prospective randomized controlled trial will test the effect of the developed communication intervention, which is fully automated, patient decision aid (SMART-DA), and user-centered information (SMART-DA-α). The web-based intervention was developed to help decision-making regarding COVID-19 vaccination among patients with underlying medical conditions. Over 450 patients will be enrolled on the web from a closed panel access website and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 equal groups stratified by their underlying disease, sex, age, and willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. SMART-DA-α provides additional information targeted at helping patients' decision-making regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Implementation outcomes are COVID-19 vaccination intention, vaccine knowledge, decisional conflict, stress related to decision-making, and attitudes toward vaccination, and was self-assessed through questionnaires.

Results: This study was funded in 2020 and approved by the Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea. Data were collected from December 2021 to January 2022. This paper was initially submitted before data analysis. The results are expected to be published in the winter of 2023.

Conclusions: We believe that the outcomes of this study will provide valuable new insights into the potential of decision aids for supporting informed decision-making regarding COVID-19 vaccination and discovering the barriers to making informed decisions regarding COVID-19 vaccination, especially among patients with underlying medical conditions. This study will provide knowledge about the common needs, fears, and perceptions concerning vaccines among patients, which can help tailor information for individuals and develop policies to support them.

Trial Registration: Korea Clinical Information Service KCT0006945; https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/20965.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/42837.

References

Witus L, Larson E . A randomized controlled trial of a video intervention shows evidence of increasing COVID-19 vaccination intention. PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0267580. PMC: 9119500. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267580. View

Agbadje T, Menear M, Gagnon M, Legare F . Theory-based approach to developing an implementation plan to support the adoption of a patient decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening. Implement Sci. 2021; 16(1):56. PMC: 8152135. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01103-5. View

Benin A, Wisler-Scher D, Colson E, Shapiro E, Holmboe E . Qualitative analysis of mothers' decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(5):1532-41. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1728. View

Volk R, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Stacey D, Elwyn G . Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014; 13 Suppl 2:S1. PMC: 4044280. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S1. View

Wensing M, Sales A, Armstrong R, Wilson P . Implementation science in times of Covid-19. Implement Sci. 2020; 15(1):42. PMC: 7276954. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01006-x. View

Keane M, Walter M, Patel B, Moorthy S, Stevens R, Bradley K . Confidence in vaccination: a parent model. Vaccine. 2005; 23(19):2486-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.10.026. View

Bruel S, Leclercq T, Ginzarly M, Botelho-Nevers E, Frappe P, Gagneux-Brunon A . Patient decision aid in vaccination: a systematic review of the literature. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2020; 19(4):305-311. DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1742111. View

Yu C, Stacey D, Sale J, Hall S, Kaplan D, Ivers N . Designing and evaluating an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes in clinical care--systematic decision aid development and study protocol. Implement Sci. 2014; 9:16. PMC: 3937124. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-16. View

Schoen E, Wopereis S . A new randomization procedure based on multiple covariates and applicable to parallel studies with simultaneous enrollment of all subjects prior to intervention. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20(1):222. PMC: 7469365. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01085-w. View

10.

Nham E, Kim Y, Jung J, Kim D, Jang H, Hyun H . COVID-19 Vaccination Rates in Patients With Chronic Medical Conditions: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study. J Korean Med Sci. 2022; 37(45):e325. PMC: 9678655. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e325. View

11.

Okan O, Bollweg T, Berens E, Hurrelmann K, Bauer U, Schaeffer D . Coronavirus-Related Health Literacy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Adults during the COVID-19 Infodemic in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(15). PMC: 7432052. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155503. View

12.

Ugwuoke J, Talabi F, Adelabu O, Sanusi B, Gever V, Onuora C . Expanding the boundaries of vaccine discourse: impact of visual illustrations communication intervention on intention towards COVID-19 vaccination among victims of insecurity in Nigeria. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021; 17(10):3450-3456. PMC: 8437524. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1886558. View

13.

Dai H, Saccardo S, Han M, Roh L, Raja N, Vangala S . Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature. 2021; 597(7876):404-409. PMC: 8443442. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03843-2. View

14.

Capponi M, Pulvirenti F, Cinicola B, Brindisi G, Conti M, Colaiocco G . Short-Term Side Effects and SARS-CoV-2 Infection after COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccine in Children Aged 5-11 Years: An Italian Real-World Study. Vaccines (Basel). 2022; 10(7). PMC: 9317287. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10071056. View

15.

Vieira Rezende R, Braz A, Guimaraes M, Ribeiro S, Abreu Vieira R, Bica B . Characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A nationwide survey of 1000 patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Vaccine. 2021; 39(44):6454-6459. PMC: 8463330. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.057. View

16.

Ishimaru T, Okawara M, Ando H, Hino A, Nagata T, Tateishi S . Gender differences in the determinants of willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine among the working-age population in Japan. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021; 17(11):3975-3981. PMC: 8827630. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1947098. View

17.

Jung J . Preparing for the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Vaccination: Evidence, Plans, and Implications. J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36(7):e59. PMC: 7900528. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e59. View

18.

Coulter A, Ellins J . Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007; 335(7609):24-7. PMC: 1910640. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80. View

19.

OConnor A . Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995; 15(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500105. View

20.

Mottelson A, Vandeweerdt C, Atchapero M, Luong T, Holz C, Bohm R . A self-administered virtual reality intervention increases COVID-19 vaccination intention. Vaccine. 2021; 39(46):6746-6753. PMC: 8498751. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.004. View