» Articles » PMID: 36595112

PD-1 Blockade Combined with Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Improves Outcome in Experimental Peritoneal Metastases from Colonic Origin in a Murine Model

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Jan 3
PMID 36595112
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was shown to induce immunogenicity of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) by induction of immunogenic cell death. We aimed to explore whether the addition of a checkpoint inhibitor would augment the effect of HIPEC in an experimental murine model of PM-CRC.

Methods: PM-CRC was established in C57BL mice by intraperitoneal inoculation of MC38 colon cancer cells. HIPEC was administered using the closed technique with mitomycin C (MMC). Clinical and immunological parameters were compared between animals treated with HIPEC alone and those treated with HIPEC + anti-programmed death receptor-1 (aPD-1).

Results: MMC-based HIPEC increased the overall survival of animals compared with sham-treated animals (22.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.14-24.53 vs. 18.9 days; 95% CI 17.6-20.3, p < 0.001). The extent of peritoneal disease as measured by the modified peritoneal carcinomatosis index was also reduced by HIPEC. This clinical benefit was accompanied by increased infiltration of CD8, CD68, and CD20 cells into tumor metastases in HIPEC-treated animals compared with sham-treated animals. We identified heat shock protein (HSP) 90 as a potential immunogenic cell death protein whose expression is increased under HIPEC conditions (fold change: 2.37 ± 1.5 vs. 1 without HIPEC, p < 0.05). Combined HIPEC + PD-1 treatment ameliorated survival compared with HIPEC alone and sham treatment (24.66; 95% CI 20.13-29.2 vs. 19; 95% CI 15.85-22.14 and 14.33 days; 95% CI 9.6-19.04, respectively; p = 0.008). This clinical effect was accompanied by increased CD8 tumor infiltration.

Conclusions: HIPEC induced the expression of immunogenic cell death signals that can support an anti-tumor immune response. This response can be further exploited by a checkpoint inhibitor.

Citing Articles

Evolution in the Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastases.

Krell M, Ranjbar S, Gitlin S, Alvarez Vega D, Wilson R, Thrasher K Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796727 PMC: 11719528. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010100.


Effects of Hyperthermia and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion on the Peritoneal and Tumor Immune Contexture.

Chia D, Demuytere J, Ernst S, Salavati H, Ceelen W Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(17).

PMID: 37686590 PMC: 10486595. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174314.

References
1.
Quenet F, Elias D, Roca L, Goere D, Ghouti L, Pocard M . Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus cytoreductive surgery alone for colorectal peritoneal metastases (PRODIGE 7): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22(2):256-266. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30599-4. View

2.
van de Vlasakker V, Lurvink R, Cashin P, Ceelen W, Deraco M, Goere D . The impact of PRODIGE 7 on the current worldwide practice of CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A web-based survey and 2021 statement by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021; 47(11):2888-2892. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.023. View

3.
Elias D, Gilly F, Boutitie F, Quenet F, Bereder J, Mansvelt B . Peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis treated with surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: retrospective analysis of 523 patients from a multicentric French study. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 28(1):63-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9285. View

4.
Baratti D, Kusamura S, Pietrantonio F, Guaglio M, Niger M, Deraco M . Progress in treatments for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases during the years 2010-2015. A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016; 100:209-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.01.017. View

5.
Carlino M, Larkin J, Long G . Immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma. Lancet. 2021; 398(10304):1002-1014. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01206-X. View