A Response and Discussion with Respect to Gulcelik's Study in Oncoplastic Level II Surgical Techniques for Breast Cancer Treatment

Overview

Journal Breast Care (Basel)

Publisher Karger

Date 2023 Jan 2

PMID 36590150

Authors

Andres Rivera

Dafne Gascon

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Editorial: risk factors for chest wall depression in breast reconstruction.

Rivera A, Ibarra G, Gascon D Gland Surg. 2022; 11(10):1588-1589.

PMID: 36353592 PMC: 9638793. DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-525.

References

Campbell E, Romics L . Oncological safety and cosmetic outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation surgery, a review of the best level of evidence literature. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2017; 9:521-530. PMC: 5552002. DOI: 10.2147/BCTT.S113742. View

Gulcelik M, Dogan L, Karaman N, Bahcecitapar M, Ozaslan C . Oncoplastic Level II Surgical Techniques for Breast Cancer Treatment: Long-Term Outcomes. Breast Care (Basel). 2022; 17(1):24-30. PMC: 8914188. DOI: 10.1159/000514468. View

Zielinski T, Lorenc-Podgorska K, Antoszewski B . Why women who have mastectomy decide not to have breast reconstruction?. Pol Przegl Chir. 2015; 86(10):451-5. DOI: 10.2478/pjs-2014-0081. View

Mansell J, Weiler-Mithoff E, Martin J, Khan A, Stallard S, Doughty J . How to compare the oncological safety of oncoplastic breast conservation surgery - To wide local excision or mastectomy?. Breast. 2015; 24(4):497-501. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.05.003. View

Stanton A, Krishnan L, Collins C . Form or function? Part 1. Subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer. 2001; 91(12):2273-81. View

Venetis M, MacGeorge E, Baptiste D, Mouton A, Friley L, Pastor R . Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016; 41(6):519-525. PMC: 5976223. DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000321. View

Zhang C, Hu G, Biskup E, Qiu X, Zhang H, Zhang H . Depression Induced by Total Mastectomy, Breast Conserving Surgery and Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2018; 42(7):2076-2085. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4477-1. View

Dogan L, Gulcelik M . Efficacy and Safety of Glandular Flap Techniques in Surgical Treatment of Large Ductal Carcinoma in situ. Breast Care (Basel). 2021; 16(3):263-268. PMC: 8248774. DOI: 10.1159/000507502. View

Chen C, Cano S, Klassen A, King T, McCarthy C, Cordeiro P . Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Breast J. 2010; 16(6):587-97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00983.x. View

10.

Pusic A, Klassen A, Scott A, Klok J, Cordeiro P, Cano S . Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124(2):345-353. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807. View

11.

Julian L . Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012; 63 Suppl 11:S467-72. PMC: 3879951. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20561. View

12.

Benson J, Dumitru D, Malata C . Oncologic safety of conservative mastectomy in the therapeutic setting. Gland Surg. 2016; 5(1):37-46. PMC: 4716866. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.05.13. View