When and Why Proactive Employees Get Promoted: A Trait Activation Perspective

Overview

Journal Curr Psychol

Publisher Springer

Specialty Psychology

Date 2023 Jan 2

PMID 36590012

Authors

Ying Zhang

Fuxi Wang

Guodong Cui

Jinzhao Qu

Yanyuan Cheng

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Although there is a consensus that workplace proactivity is vital for both employees and organizations, little is known as whether proactivity is beneficial for employees to develop leadership capabilities. Drawing from trait activation theory, we theorize that proactive personality could enhance employee promotability through taking charge behavior. We also propose that task structure determines the odds that proactive employees might be promoted. We tested the theoretical model with data from 226 employees and their direct leaders in 26 teams at three time points. The results of multi-level path analysis indicated that the positive relationship between proactive personality and taking charge was stronger in more organic work unit, which in turn, positively related to employees' promotability. These findings provide new knowledge in understanding the impacts of proactive personality and offers important empirical practices for proactivity management for organizations.

Citing Articles

Flourishing and job satisfaction in employees working in UK clinical trial units: a national cross-sectional survey.

Hall S, Riga E, Sprange K, Hagan P, Carr L, Taylor J BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1522.

PMID: 39623423 PMC: 11610179. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11986-x.

Addressing the "Lying Flat" Challenge in China: Incentive Mechanisms for New-Generation Employees through a Moderated Mediation Model.

Zhou J, Yang J, Faye B Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39199066 PMC: 11351220. DOI: 10.3390/bs14080670.

Employee Proactive Personality and Career Growth: The Role of Proactive Behavior and Leader Proactive Personality.

Ma G, Zhu X, Ma B, Lassleben H Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38540559 PMC: 10967701. DOI: 10.3390/bs14030256.

Impact of Social Media Addiction and Internet Gaming Disorder on Sleep Quality: Serial Mediation Analyses.

Krishnan A, Chew P Psychiatr Q. 2024; 95(2):185-202.

PMID: 38512552 DOI: 10.1007/s11126-024-10068-9.

In Search of Conceptual Clarity About the Structure of Psychopathic Traits in Children: A Network-Based Proposal.

Lopez-Romero L, Andershed H, Romero E, Cervin M Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024; .

PMID: 38236454 DOI: 10.1007/s10578-023-01649-z.

References

Parker S, Axtell C, Turner N . Designing a safer workplace: importance of job autonomy, communication quality, and supportive supervisors. J Occup Health Psychol. 2001; 6(3):211-28. View

Thompson J . Proactive personality and job performance: a social capital perspective. J Appl Psychol. 2005; 90(5):1011-7. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.1011. View

Li N, Harris T, Boswell W, Xie Z . The role of organizational insiders' developmental feedback and proactive personality on newcomers' performance: an interactionist perspective. J Appl Psychol. 2011; 96(6):1317-27. DOI: 10.1037/a0024029. View

Sun S, van Emmerik H . Are proactive personalities always beneficial? Political skill as a moderator. J Appl Psychol. 2014; 100(3):966-75. DOI: 10.1037/a0037833. View

Moon H, Kamdar D, Mayer D, Takeuchi R . Me or we? The role of personality and justice as other-centered antecedents to innovative citizenship behaviors within organizations. J Appl Psychol. 2008; 93(1):84-94. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.84. View

Tett R, Burnett D . A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. J Appl Psychol. 2003; 88(3):500-17. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500. View

Dragoni L, Kuenzi M . Better understanding work unit goal orientation: Its emergence and impact under different types of work unit structure. J Appl Psychol. 2012; 97(5):1032-48. DOI: 10.1037/a0028405. View

Caspi A, Roberts B, Shiner R . Personality development: stability and change. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005; 56:453-84. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913. View

Hollenbeck J, Moon H, Ellis A, West B, Ilgen D, Sheppard L . Structural contingency theory and individual differences: examination of external and internal person-team fit. J Appl Psychol. 2002; 87(3):599-606. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.599. View

10.

Preacher K, Rucker D, Hayes A . Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 42(1):185-227. DOI: 10.1080/00273170701341316. View

11.

Geldhof G, Preacher K, Zyphur M . Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychol Methods. 2013; 19(1):72-91. DOI: 10.1037/a0032138. View

12.

Seibert S, Crant J, Kraimer M . Proactive personality and career success. J Appl Psychol. 1999; 84(3):416-27. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416. View

13.

Lian H, Ferris D, Brown D . Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. J Appl Psychol. 2011; 97(1):107-123. DOI: 10.1037/a0024610. View

14.

Dickson M, Resick C, Hanges P . When organizational climate is unambiguous, it is also strong. J Appl Psychol. 2006; 91(2):351-64. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.351. View

15.

Chan D . Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2006; 91(2):475-81. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.475. View

16.

Li N, Liang J, Crant J . The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: a relational perspective. J Appl Psychol. 2010; 95(2):395-404. DOI: 10.1037/a0018079. View

17.

Dimotakis N, Davison R, Hollenbeck J . Team structure and regulatory focus: the impact of regulatory fit on team dynamic. J Appl Psychol. 2011; 97(2):421-34. DOI: 10.1037/a0026701. View

18.

Hudson N, Roberts B, Lodi-Smith J . Personality Trait Development and Social Investment in Work. J Res Pers. 2012; 46(3):334-344. PMC: 3398702. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.002. View

19.

Ambrose M, Schminke M . Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. J Appl Psychol. 2003; 88(2):295-305. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.295. View

20.

Ambrose M, Schminke M, Mayer D . Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: a moderated mediation approach. J Appl Psychol. 2013; 98(4):678-89. DOI: 10.1037/a0032080. View