» Articles » PMID: 36588797

A Cuproptosis-Related LncRNAs Signature Could Accurately Predict Prognosis in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Overview
Date 2023 Jan 2
PMID 36588797
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common subtype of kidney cancers. As cuproptosis, a new cell death mechanism proposed recently, differs from all other known mechanisms regulating cell death, we aimed to create prognostic markers using cuproptosis-related long non-coding ribonucleic acids (RNAs; lncRNAs) and elucidate the molecular mechanism.

Methods: Data from transcriptome RNA sequencing of ccRCC samples and the relevant clinical data were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and Pearson's correlation analysis was implemented to obtain the cuproptosis-related lncRNAs. Then, univariate Cox, multivariate Cox, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Cox analyses were performed to construct the risk signatures. The cuproptosis-related lncRNAs predictive signature was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves and subgroup analysis. Finally, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA), tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), and immune checkpoints were performed to explore the relationship between immunity and patient prognosis.

Results: Five cuproptosis-related lncRNAs, including FOXD2-AS1, LINC00460, AC091212.1, AC007365.1, and AC026401.3, were used to construct the signature. In the training and test sets, low-risk groups (as identified by a risk score lower than the median) demonstrated a better prognosis with an area under the curve for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival being 0.793, 0.716, and 0.719, respectively. GSEA analysis suggested significant enrichment of the tricarboxylic acid cycle and metabolism-related pathways in the low-risk group. Besides, both ssGSEA and TIME suggested that the high-risk group exhibited more active immune infiltration.

Conclusion: We proposed a cuproptosis-related lncRNAs signature, which had the potential for prognoses and prediction. Our findings might contribute to elucidating potential genomic biomarkers and targets for future therapies in the cuproptosis-related signaling pathways.

Citing Articles

Up-regulation of Cuproptosis-related lncRNAS in Patients Receiving Immunotherapy for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Indicates Progressive Disease.

Katifelis H, Grammatikaki S, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Karamouzis M, Stravodimos K In Vivo. 2024; 39(1):146-151.

PMID: 39740865 PMC: 11705156. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13812.


Bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation of m6A and cuproptosis-related lncRNA NFE4 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Feng R, Li H, Meng T, Fei M, Yang C Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):187.

PMID: 38797784 PMC: 11128431. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01023-y.


Characterization of tumor microenvironment and sensitive chemotherapy drugs based on cuproptosis-related signatures in renal cell carcinoma.

Tang J, Yao F, Yao Z, Xing X Aging (Albany NY). 2023; 15(18):9695-9717.

PMID: 37728407 PMC: 10564438. DOI: 10.18632/aging.205043.

References
1.
Zhao H, Cao Y, Wang Y, Zhang L, Chen C, Wang Y . Dynamic prognostic model for kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) patients by combining clinical and genetic information. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):17613. PMC: 6279814. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35981-5. View

2.
Majidinia M, Yousefi B . Long non-coding RNAs in cancer drug resistance development. DNA Repair (Amst). 2016; 45:25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.06.003. View

3.
Moch H, Cubilla A, Humphrey P, Reuter V, Ulbright T . The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours. Eur Urol. 2016; 70(1):93-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029. View

4.
Shah A, Kotecha R, Lemke E, Chandramohan A, Chaim J, Msaouel P . Outcomes of patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with second-line VEGFR-TKI after first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors. Eur J Cancer. 2019; 114:67-75. PMC: 7537491. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.003. View

5.
Dienstmann R, Villacampa G, Sveen A, Mason M, Niedzwiecki D, Nesbakken A . Relative contribution of clinicopathological variables, genomic markers, transcriptomic subtyping and microenvironment features for outcome prediction in stage II/III colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2019; 30(10):1622-1629. PMC: 6857614. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz287. View