» Articles » PMID: 36583958

Use of Reactive Balance Assessments With Clinical Baseline Concussion Assessments in Collegiate Athletes

Overview
Journal J Athl Train
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Dec 30
PMID 36583958
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.

Objectives: To identify redundancy in current clinical baseline assessments of concussion and determine whether reactive balance adds unique information to these evaluations.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Clinical assessment.

Patients Or Other Participants: A total of 279 healthy National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes.

Intervention(s): Two cohorts of data were collected at the beginning of the athletic season. For cohort 1 (n = 191), the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool, instrumented modified push and release (I-mP&R), and Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) were administered. For cohort 2 (n = 88), the I-mP&R, BESS, timed tandem gait, walking with eyes closed, and clinical reaction time were administered.

Main Outcome Measure(s): The strengths of the relationships between the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool cognitive indices, mP&R clinical score, instrumented measures (BESS sway; I-mP&R time to stability, latency, and step length), BESS score, timed tandem gait, walking time to completion, and clinical reaction time were characterized.

Results: The strongest interinstrument correlation value was between single-task time to stability from the I-mP&R and clinical reaction time but was considered weak (r = 0.35, P = .001). The mP&R and I-mP&R clinical scores were weakly associated with the other assessments.

Conclusions: Weak correlations between interassessment variables indicated that little redundancy was present in the current clinical evaluations. Furthermore, reactive balance represents a unique domain of function that may improve the comprehensiveness of clinical assessments.

Citing Articles

The Relation Among Reactive Stepping and Fall-Related Psychological Factors in Multiple Sclerosis.

Takla T, Monaghan P, Peterson D, Fritz N Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766396 PMC: 11674261. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121197.


Instrumented Static and Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes: Normative Values and Minimal Detectable Change.

Petersell T, Quammen D, Crofts R, Morris A, Fino N, Jensen C J Athl Train. 2023; 59(6):608-616.

PMID: 38014789 PMC: 11220770. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0403.23.

References
1.
Carty C, Cronin N, Nicholson D, Lichtwark G, Mills P, Kerr G . Reactive stepping behaviour in response to forward loss of balance predicts future falls in community-dwelling older adults. Age Ageing. 2014; 44(1):109-15. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afu054. View

2.
Mummareddy N, Brett B, Yengo-Kahn A, Solomon G, Zuckerman S . Sway Balance Mobile Application: Reliability, Acclimation, and Baseline Administration. Clin J Sport Med. 2018; 30(5):451-457. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000626. View

3.
Maki B, Zecevic A, Bateni H, Kirshenbaum N, Mcilroy W . Cognitive demands of executing postural reactions: does aging impede attention switching?. Neuroreport. 2001; 12(16):3583-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200111160-00042. View

4.
Wrisley D, Marchetti G, Kuharsky D, Whitney S . Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Phys Ther. 2004; 84(10):906-18. View

5.
Horak F, Wrisley D, Frank J . The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther. 2009; 89(5):484-98. PMC: 2676433. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20080071. View