» Articles » PMID: 36583877

Children With Amblyopia Make More Saccadic Fixations When Doing the Visual Search Task

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2022 Dec 30
PMID 36583877
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Individuals with amblyopia are known to have functional vision deficits (e.g., reduced reading speed) in spite of good visual acuity in the nonamblyopic eye. We studied and compared eye movements in children with and without amblyopia to examine how a visual scene is explored during visual search.

Methods: Children (six to 16 years of age) in the control group (n = 14) and cases group with anisometropic amblyopia (n = 23) participated in a visual search study, in which they looked for targets in real-world images displayed on a computer monitor. Eyelink 1000 Plus was used to track the eye movements. Three viewing conditions were randomized: dominant/fellow eye, nondominant/amblyopic eye, and binocular viewing. Visual search performance was measured by combining search time and accuracy.

Results: As expected, poorer visual search performance was observed in the amblyopic eye when compared to the controls and fellow eye (P < 0.005). However, the reaction time was longer even in binocular and fellow eye viewing conditions than the controls (P < 0.028). Children with amblyopia made more saccades (17 vs. 12, P = 0.007), without the need to fixate longer (P = 0.312), but with more fixations in the target interest area (4.65 vs. 3.14, P = 0.002) when compared to controls. These eye movement patterns were observed in both the fellow eye and binocular viewing conditions.

Conclusions: In spite of good visual acuity in the fellow eye, children with amblyopia needed to sample the scene with more fixations. Even upon gazing at the target location, they made more fixations before confirming a hit. These search patterns suggest a possible narrower spatial visual span to process the visual information in children with amblyopia.

Citing Articles

Deficits of the "Good" Eye in Amblyopia: Processing Geometric Properties.

Zhu M, Liang J, Wang W, Deng H, Huang Y Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(8):33.

PMID: 39028978 PMC: 11262476. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.8.33.

References
1.
McKee S, Levi D, Schor C, Movshon J . Saccadic latency in amblyopia. J Vis. 2016; 16(5):3. PMC: 5089444. DOI: 10.1167/16.5.3. View

2.
Perdziak M, Witkowska D, Gryncewicz W, Przekoracka-Krawczyk A, Ober J . The amblyopic eye in subjects with anisometropia show increased saccadic latency in the delayed saccade task. Front Integr Neurosci. 2014; 8:77. PMC: 4196517. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00077. View

3.
Schneider R, Thurtell M, Eisele S, Lincoff N, Bala E, Leigh R . Neurological basis for eye movements of the blind. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e56556. PMC: 3575504. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056556. View

4.
Brainard D . The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):433-6. View

5.
Chung S, Li R, Levi D . Learning to identify near-acuity letters, either with or without flankers, results in improved letter size and spacing limits in adults with amblyopia. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e35829. PMC: 3340394. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035829. View