» Articles » PMID: 36583012

Grasping the Semantic of Actions: a Combined Behavioral and MEG Study

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Dec 30
PMID 36583012
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is experimental evidence that the brain systems involved in action execution also play a role in action observation and understanding. Recently, it has been suggested that the sensorimotor system is also involved in language processing. Supporting results are slower response times and weaker motor-related MEG Beta band power suppression in semantic decision tasks on single action verbs labels when the stimulus and the motor response involve the same effector. Attenuated power suppression indicates decreased cortical excitability and consequent decreased readiness to act. The embodied approach forwards that the simultaneous involvement of the sensorimotor system in the processing of the linguistic content and in the planning of the response determines this language-motor interference effect. Here, in a combined behavioral and MEG study we investigated to what extent the processing of actions visually presented (i.e., pictures of actions) and verbally described (i.e., verbs in written words) share common neural mechanisms. The findings demonstrated that, whether an action is experienced visually or verbally, its processing engages the sensorimotor system in a comparable way. These results provide further support to the embodied view of semantic processing, suggesting that this process is independent from the modality of presentation of the stimulus, including language.

Citing Articles

Activity in Occipito-Temporal Cortex Is Involved in Tool-Use Planning and Contributes to Tool-Related Semantic Neural Representations.

Thibault S, Koun E, Salemme R, Roy A, Boulenger V, Brozzoli C Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024; 5(4):1008-1024.

PMID: 39640363 PMC: 11620707. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00159.

References
1.
Fischer M, Zwaan R . Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008; 61(6):825-50. DOI: 10.1080/17470210701623605. View

2.
Jirak D, Menz M, Buccino G, Borghi A, Binkofski F . Grasping language--a short story on embodiment. Conscious Cogn. 2010; 19(3):711-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.020. View

3.
Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L . The mirror mechanism: recent findings and perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014; 369(1644):20130420. PMC: 4006191. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0420. View

4.
Pulvermuller F . A brain perspective on language mechanisms: from discrete neuronal ensembles to serial order. Prog Neurobiol. 2002; 67(2):85-111. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00014-x. View

5.
Klepp A, Niccolai V, Buccino G, Schnitzler A, Biermann-Ruben K . Language-motor interference reflected in MEG beta oscillations. Neuroimage. 2015; 109:438-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.077. View