» Articles » PMID: 36582805

Left Versus Right Approach for Middle and Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-matched Study

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Dec 30
PMID 36582805
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite superior short-term outcomes, there is considerable debate about the oncological efficacy of the left approach esophagectomy for middle and lower squamous esophageal carcinoma (ESCC). A propensity score-matched retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the left approach's short- and long-term effects.

Methods: We recorded data from patients with ESCC who underwent curative resection the left or right approach between January 2010 and December 2015. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and maximally selected rank statistics (MSRS) were utilized to determine the appropriate number of lymph nodes to resect during esophagectomy.

Results: One hundred and forty-eight ESCC patients underwent esophagectomy the right approach, and 108 underwent the left approach esophagectomy. After PSM, the left approach esophagectomy showed statistically significant superiority in operative time and time to oral intake, and there was a trend toward a shorter length of hospital stay. Fewer cervical, upper thoracic, and recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes were harvested the left approach than the right approach; the total number of lymph nodes harvested the left and right approaches was similar. Similar long-term survival outcomes were achieved. MSRS suggested that at least 25 lymph nodes are needed to be resected during esophagectomy to improve survival in N0 patients.

Conclusions: The left approach esophagectomy might facilitate postoperative recovery in patients with middle and lower ESCC. With adequate lymphadenectomy, the left approach esophagectomy might achieve similar long-term outcomes for middle and lower ESCC patients.

References
1.
Li B, Hu H, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Miao L, Ma L . Extended Right Thoracic Approach Compared With Limited Left Thoracic Approach for Patients With Middle and Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Three-year Survival of a Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Trial. Ann Surg. 2017; 267(5):826-832. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002280. View

2.
Ma Q, Liu W, Long H, Rong T, Zhang L, Lin Y . Right versus left transthoracic approach for lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015; 10:123. PMC: 4575477. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-015-0328-4. View

3.
Lerut T, Wiesel O . History of esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(10):897. PMC: 8184447. DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-676. View

4.
Zhang H, Wang J, Wang W, Zhou L, Chen J, Yang B . [A meta-analysis of esophagectomy: the comparative study of Ivor-Lewis operation and Sweet operation]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014; 17(9):892-7. View

5.
Yang D, Mao Y, He J, Gao S, Sun K, Mu J . Long-term survival of the middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer patients after surgical treatment through left or right thoracic approach. J Thorac Dis. 2018; 10(5):2648-2655. PMC: 6006125. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.45. View