Accuracy of Steps Measured by Smartphones-based WeRun Compared with ActiGraph-GT3X Accelerometer in Free-living Conditions

Overview

Journal Front Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2022 Dec 30

PMID 36582382

Authors

Qinqin Yao

Jing Wang

Yucong Sun

Li Zhang

Shuangyuan Sun

Minna Cheng

Qinping Yang

Siyuan Wang

Ling Huang

Tao Lin

Yingnan Jia

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of steps tracked by smartphone-based WeChat app compared with Actigraph-GT3X accelerometer in free-living conditions.

Design: A cross-sectional study and repeated measures.

Methods: A total of 103 employees in the Pudong New Area of Shanghai, China, participated in this study. The participants wore an ActiGraph-GT3X accelerometer during the period of August to September 2019 (Time 1), December 2019 (Time 2) and September 2020 (Time 3). Each time, they wore the ActiGraph-GT3X accelerometer continuously for 7 days to assess their 7-day step counts. The smartphone-based WeRun step counts were collected in the corresponding period when subjects wore accelerometers. The subjects were invited to complete basic demographic characteristics questionnaires and to perform physical examination to obtain health-related results such as height, body weight, body fat percentage, waist circumference, hip circumference, and blood pressure.

Results: Based on 103 participants' 21 days of data, we found that the Spearman correlation coefficient between them was 0.733 ( < 0.01). The average number of WeRun steps measured by smartphones was 8,975 (4,059) per day, which was higher than those measured by accelerometers (8,462 ± 3,486 per day, < 0.01). Demographic characteristics and different conditions can affect the consistency of measurements. The consistency was higher in those who were male, older, master's degree and above educated, and traveled by walking. Steps measured by smartphone and accelerometer in working days and August showed stronger correlation than other working conditions and time. Mean absolute percent error (MAPE) for step counts ranged from 0.5 to 15.9%. The test-retest reliability coefficients of WeRun steps ranged from 0.392 to 0.646. A multiple regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, and MVPA/step counts measured during Time 1 showed that body composition (body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, waist circumference, and hip circumference) was correlated with moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity, but it was not correlated with WeRun step counts.

Conclusions: The smartphone-based WeChat app can be used to assess physical activity step counts and is a reliable tool for measuring steps in free-living conditions. However, WeRun step counts' utilization is potentially limited in predicting body composition.

References

Aadland E, Ylvisaker E . Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer in Adults under Free-Living Conditions. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0134606. PMC: 4537282. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134606. View

Macfarlane D, Lee C, Ho E, Chan K, Chan D . Convergent validity of six methods to assess physical activity in daily life. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006; 101(5):1328-34. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00336.2006. View

Klinker C, Schipperijn J, Christian H, Kerr J, Ersboll A, Troelsen J . Using accelerometers and global positioning system devices to assess gender and age differences in children's school, transport, leisure and home based physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11:8. PMC: 3905652. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-8. View

Donaire-Gonzalez D, de Nazelle A, Seto E, Mendez M, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Jerrett M . Comparison of physical activity measures using mobile phone-based CalFit and Actigraph. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(6):e111. PMC: 3713904. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2470. View

An K . Comparison between walking and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: associations with metabolic syndrome components in Korean older adults. Epidemiol Health. 2020; 42:e2020066. PMC: 7871155. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2020066. View

Tudor-Locke C, Craig C, Thyfault J, Spence J . A step-defined sedentary lifestyle index: <5000 steps/day. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013; 38(2):100-14. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2012-0235. View

Bravata D, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger A, Lin N, Lewis R . Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007; 298(19):2296-304. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.19.2296. View

Zhai Y, Nasseri N, Pottgen J, Gezhelbash E, Heesen C, Stellmann J . Smartphone Accelerometry: A Smart and Reliable Measurement of Real-Life Physical Activity in Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy Individuals. Front Neurol. 2020; 11:688. PMC: 7456810. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00688. View

Lyden K, Kozey S, Staudenmeyer J, Freedson P . A comprehensive evaluation of commonly used accelerometer energy expenditure and MET prediction equations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010; 111(2):187-201. PMC: 3432480. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1639-8. View

10.

Case M, Burwick H, Volpp K, Patel M . Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. JAMA. 2015; 313(6):625-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.17841. View

11.

Cooper A, Andersen L, Wedderkopp N, Page A, Froberg K . Physical activity levels of children who walk, cycle, or are driven to school. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 29(3):179-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.05.009. View

12.

Harrington D, Welk G, Donnelly A . Validation of MET estimates and step measurement using the ActivPAL physical activity logger. J Sports Sci. 2011; 29(6):627-33. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2010.549499. View

13.

Vandelanotte C, Duncan M, Stanton R, Rosenkranz R, Caperchione C, Rebar A . Validity and responsiveness to change of the Active Australia Survey according to gender, age, BMI, education, and physical activity level and awareness. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):407. PMC: 6466730. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6717-1. View

14.

Piccinini F, Martinelli G, Carbonaro A . Accuracy of Mobile Applications versus Wearable Devices in Long-Term Step Measurements. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(21). PMC: 7663794. DOI: 10.3390/s20216293. View

15.

Lee I, Buchner D . The importance of walking to public health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40(7 Suppl):S512-8. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c65d0. View

16.

Wyszynska J, Matlosz P, Podgorska-Bednarz J, Herbert J, Przednowek K, Baran J . Adaptation and validation of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents (PAQ-A) among Polish adolescents: cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(11):e030567. PMC: 6887051. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030567. View

17.

Lyden K, Keadle S, Staudenmayer J, Freedson P . A method to estimate free-living active and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 46(2):386-97. PMC: 4527685. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a42a2d. View

18.

Amagasa S, Kamada M, Sasai H, Fukushima N, Kikuchi H, Lee I . How Well iPhones Measure Steps in Free-Living Conditions: Cross-Sectional Validation Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(1):e10418. PMC: 6329418. DOI: 10.2196/10418. View

19.

Barriera T, Tudor-Locke C, Champagne C, Broyles S, Johnson W, Katzmarzyk P . Comparison of GT3X accelerometer and YAMAX pedometer steps/day in a free-living sample of overweight and obese adults. J Phys Act Health. 2012; 10(2):263-70. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.10.2.263. View

20.

Polese J, E Faria G, Ribeiro-Samora G, Lima L, de Morais Faria C, Scianni A . Google fit smartphone application or Gt3X Actigraph: Which is better for detecting the stepping activity of individuals with stroke? A validity study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019; 23(3):461-465. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.01.011. View