» Articles » PMID: 36581868

Effectiveness of Clinical Decision Support in Controlling Inappropriate Red Blood Cell and Platelet Transfusions, Speciality Specific Responses and Behavioural Change

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Dec 29
PMID 36581868
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Electronic clinical decision support (CDS) within Electronic Health Records has been used to improve patient safety, including reducing unnecessary blood product transfusions. We assessed the effectiveness of CDS in controlling inappropriate red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion in a large acute hospital and how speciality specific behaviours changed in response.

Methods: We used segmented linear regression of interrupted time series models to analyse the instantaneous and long term effect of introducing blood product electronic warnings to prescribers. We studied the impact on transfusions for patients in critical care (CC), haematology/oncology (HO) and elsewhere.

Results: In non-CC or HO, there was significant and sustained decrease in the numbers of RBC transfusions after introduction of alerts. In CC the alerts reduced transfusions but this was not sustained, and in HO there was no impact on RBC transfusion. For platelet transfusions outside of CC and HO, the introduction of alerts stopped a rising trend of administration of platelets above recommended targets. In CC, alerts reduced platelet transfusions, but in HO alerts had little impact on clinician prescribing.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that CDS can result in immediate change in user behaviour which is more obvious outside specialist settings of CC and HO. It is important that this is then sustained. In CC and HO, blood transfusion practices differ. CDS thus needs to take specific circumstances into account. In this case there are acceptable reasons to transfuse outside of these crude targets and CDS should take these into account.

Citing Articles

Red blood cell transfusion clinical decision support: A scoping review of guideline adherence and clinical impact.

Czako S, Prochaska M Transfusion. 2025; 65(2):410-419.

PMID: 39828901 PMC: 11842101. DOI: 10.1111/trf.18122.


Consensus of the Brazilian association of hematology, hemotherapy and cellular therapy on patient blood management: Implementation of Patient Blood Management (PBM).

Macedo M, Biagini S, Montano-Pedroso J, Ribeiro G, Junior J, Rizzo S Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2024; 46 Suppl 1:S8-S11.

PMID: 38548507 PMC: 11069055. DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2024.02.004.


Anemia diagnosis and therapy in malignant diseases: implementation of guidelines-a representative study.

Link H, Kerkmann M, Holtmann L, Detzner M Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(2):113.

PMID: 38240843 PMC: 10799088. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08267-4.


Advances in Clinical Decision Support Systems: Contributions from the 2022 Literature.

Lehmann C, Subbian V Yearb Med Inform. 2023; 32(1):179-183.

PMID: 38147860 PMC: 10751149. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768751.


Let Us Know Transfusion Triggers for Prophylactic Use of Platelet Concentrate-Analysis of Compliance with Recent Transfusion Guidelines in a Large Academic Medical Center.

Czempik P, Herzyk J, Wilczek D J Clin Med. 2023; 12(18).

PMID: 37762827 PMC: 10532288. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185885.

References
1.
Stokes E, Wordsworth S, Staves J, Mundy N, Skelly J, Radford K . Accurate costs of blood transfusion: a microcosting of administering blood products in the United Kingdom National Health Service. Transfusion. 2018; 58(4):846-853. DOI: 10.1111/trf.14493. View

2.
Sardar M, Azharuddin M, Subedi A, Ghatage P, Du D, Szallasi A . Improving Blood Transfusion Practices in a Community Hospital Setting: Our Experience with Real-Time Clinical Decision Support. Med Sci (Basel). 2018; 6(3). PMC: 6164780. DOI: 10.3390/medsci6030067. View

3.
Lin Y, Chang C, Yeh C, Wu Y . The appropriateness and physician compliance of platelet usage by a computerized transfusion decision support system in a medical center. Transfusion. 2010; 50(12):2565-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02757.x. View

4.
Simon G, Craswell A, Thom O, Fung Y . Outcomes of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies in older adults from nine randomised controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Haematol. 2017; 4(10):e465-e474. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30141-2. View

5.
Nwulu U, Brooks H, Richardson S, McFarland L, Coleman J . Electronic risk assessment for venous thromboembolism: investigating physicians' rationale for bypassing clinical decision support recommendations. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(9):e005647. PMC: 4179407. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005647. View