» Articles » PMID: 36581726

Impact of Cancer Care Regionalization on Patient Volume

Abstract

Background: Cancer centers are regionalizing care to expand patient access, but the effects on patient volume are unknown. This study aimed to compare patient volumes before and after the establishment of head and neck regional care centers (HNRCCs).

Methods: This study analyzed 35,394 unique new patient visits at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) before and after the creation of HNRCCs. Univariate regression estimated the rate of increase in new patient appointments. Geospatial analysis evaluated patient origin and distribution.

Results: The mean new patients per year in 2006-2011 versus 2012-2017 was 2735 ± 156 patients versus 3155 ± 207 patients, including 464 ± 78 patients at HNRCCs, reflecting a 38.4 % increase in overall patient volumes. The rate of increase in new patient appointments did not differ significantly before and after HNRCCs (121.9 vs 95.8 patients/year; P = 0.519). The patients from counties near HNRCCs, showed a 210.8 % increase in appointments overall, 33.8 % of which were at an HNRCC. At the main campus exclusively, the shift in regional patients to HNRCCs coincided with a lower rate of increase in patients from the MDACC service area (33.7 vs. 11.0 patients/year; P = 0.035), but the trend was toward a greater increase in out-of-state patients (25.7 vs. 40.3 patients/year; P = 0.299).

Conclusions: The creation of HNRCCs coincided with stable increases in new patient volume, and a sizeable minority of patients sought care at regional centers. Regional patients shifted to the HNRCCs, and out-of-state patient volume increased at the main campus, optimizing access for both local and out-of-state patients.

Citing Articles

Cross-State Travel for Cancer Care and Implications for Telehealth Reciprocity.

Moen E, Wang Q, Liu L, Wang F, Tosteson A, Smith R JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2461021.

PMID: 39982726 PMC: 11846006. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61021.


Beyond the sarcoma center: establishing the Sarcoma HASM network-a Hub and Spoke Model network for global integrated and precision care.

Fuchs B, Gronchi A ESMO Open. 2024; 9(12):103734.

PMID: 39642636 PMC: 11666932. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103734.

References
1.
Chang D, Zhang Y, Mukherjee D, Wolfgang C, Schulick R, Cameron J . Variations in referral patterns to high-volume centers for pancreatic cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209(6):720-6. PMC: 4036485. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.011. View

2.
Lin C, Lin H . Effects of surgeon and hospital volume on 5-year survival rates following oral cancer resections: the experience of an Asian country. Surgery. 2008; 143(3):343-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.09.033. View

3.
Oliver J, Persky M, Wang B, Duvvuri U, Gross N, Vaezi A . Transoral robotic surgery adoption and safety in treatment of oropharyngeal cancers. Cancer. 2021; 128(4):685-696. PMC: 9446338. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33995. View

4.
Chen M, Megwalu U, Liew J, Sirjani D, Rosenthal E, Divi V . Regionalization of head and neck cancer surgery may fragment care and impact overall survival. Laryngoscope. 2018; 129(6):1413-1419. DOI: 10.1002/lary.27440. View

5.
Farquhar D, Masood M, Lenze N, Sheth S, Patel S, Lumley C . Academic Affiliation and Surgical Volume Predict Survival in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Surgery. Laryngoscope. 2020; 131(2):E479-E488. DOI: 10.1002/lary.28744. View