» Articles » PMID: 36581450

Electroanatomical Mapping-guided Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Structural Heart Disease and Advanced Conduction Abnormalities

Abstract

Aims: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) can be technically challenging and fluoroscopy-intense. Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping (EAM) facilitates non-fluoroscopic lead navigation and electrogram mapping. We sought to prospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of routine EAM-guided LBBAP in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and advanced conduction abnormalities.

Methods And Results: Consecutive patients with SHD and conduction abnormalities who underwent an attempt at EAM-guided LBBAP were included. The feasibility, safety, procedural, and mid-term outcomes were evaluated. Electrical, echocardiographic, and clinical parameters were assessed at implantation and last follow-up. Thirty-two patients (68 ± 18 years; 19% female) were included, of which 75% had intrinsic QRS > 150 ms, 53% left bundle branch block, and 25% right bundle branch block. Primary EAM-guided LBBAP was successful in 29 patients (91%). The procedural duration was 95 (70-110) min, total fluoroscopy time 0.93 (0.40-1.73) min, and total fluoroscopy dose 35.4 (20.5-77.2) cGy cm2. Paced QRS duration (QRSd) was significantly shorter than intrinsic QRSd (121.9 ± 10.7 vs. 159.2 ± 34.4 ms; P < 0.001) and remained stable during the mean follow-up of 7.0 ± 5.9 months. The LBBAP capture threshold was 0.57 ± 0.23 V/0.4 ms at implantation and remained low during follow-up (0.58 ± 0.18 V/0.5 ± 0.2 ms; P = 0.877). Overall left ventricular ejection fraction improved significantly from 44.2 ± 14.3% at baseline to 49.4 ± 13.1% at follow-up (P = 0.009), New York Heart Association class from 2.4 ± 0.6 to 1.8 ± 0.6 (P = 0.002), respectively. No complications occurred that required intervention.

Conclusion: Routine near-zero fluoroscopy EAM-guided LBBAP can safely be performed in patients with SHD and advanced conduction abnormalities with high success rates and favourable mid-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to investigate whether the use of EAM improves the overall outcome of conduction system pacing and to identify specific patient populations who benefit the most from EAM-guided lead implantation.

Citing Articles

Pacing of the specialized His Purkinje conduction system: 'HOW and FOR WHOM'.

Chiarazzo E, Golia P, Bressi E, Grieco D, De Ruvo E, Calo L Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025; 27(Suppl 1):i141-i148.

PMID: 39980764 PMC: 11836725. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae113.


Refining cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comprehensive review on the role of advanced multimodality imaging.

Stoiculescu F, Hadareanu D, Hadareanu C, Donoiu I, Florescu C Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 11:1406899.

PMID: 39744205 PMC: 11688290. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1406899.


Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Conduction System Pacing Guided by Electro-Anatomical Mapping: A Case Report.

Pestrea C, Enache R, Cicala E, Vatasescu R J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(11).

PMID: 37998514 PMC: 10672479. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10110456.


Are three-dimensional mapping systems useful for left bundle branch area pacing?.

Celentano E, Ignatiuk B, Cristiano E, Bia E, Monaco M, de Groot N HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2023; 9(7):465-468.

PMID: 37492049 PMC: 10363463. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2023.04.011.


Comparison of novel ventricular pacing strategies using an electro-mechanical simulation platform.

Meiburg R, Rijks J, Beela A, Bressi E, Grieco D, Delhaas T Europace. 2023; 25(6).

PMID: 37306315 PMC: 10259067. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad144.


References
1.
Huang W, Chen X, Su L, Wu S, Xia X, Vijayaraman P . A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2019; 16(12):1791-1796. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.06.016. View

2.
Padala S, Master V, Terricabras M, Chiocchini A, Garg A, Kron J . Initial Experience, Safety, and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Multicenter Prospective Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020; 6(14):1773-1782. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.004. View

3.
Jastrzebski M . ECG and Pacing Criteria for Differentiating Conduction System Pacing from Myocardial Pacing. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021; 10(3):172-180. PMC: 8576513. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2021.26. View

4.
Sharma P, Huang H, Trohman R, Naperkowski A, Ellenbogen K, Vijayaraman P . Low Fluoroscopy Permanent His Bundle Pacing Using Electroanatomic Mapping: A Feasibility Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019; 12(2):e006967. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006967. View

5.
Sharma P, Patel N, Ravi V, Zalavadia D, Dommaraju S, Garg V . Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to right ventricular pacing: Results from the Geisinger-Rush Conduction System Pacing Registry. Heart Rhythm. 2021; 19(1):3-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.08.033. View