» Articles » PMID: 36579050

Meniscal Bone Angle Is a Strong Predictor of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Overview
Date 2022 Dec 29
PMID 36579050
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of lateral posterior tibial slope (LPTS) and meniscal bone angle (MBA) on primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear risk in an adult population through the LPTS-MBA ratio.

Methods: A retrospective case-control study was performed with patients from a tertiary hospital who underwent primary ACL surgery and had preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These subjects were matched by age and sex in a 1:1 ratio to patients who had an MRI without ACL tear. LPTS and MBA were measured on MRI scan. Quantitative data are presented in the median ± interquartile range (IQR). Identification of independent risk factors for primary ACL tear was performed using multivariable logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristics curves detected any variable with strong discriminative capacity.

Results: In total, 95 patients with primary ACL tear confirmed on MRI were matched with 95 controls (N = 190). Nearly 80% were male subjects, with a median age of 26 years. In the ACL tear group, the median value of LPTS-MBA ratio was 0.20 (IQR 0.11-0.37) versus 0.12 (IQR 0.08-0.19) in the control group ( = .001). LPTS had a median value of 4.20° in the ACL tear group (IQR 2.05-7.35°) and 2.90° in the control group (IQR, 2.05-5.00°) ( = .026), whereas MBA was 19° (IQR, 16-24°) versus 26° (IQR, 24-30°) ( = .001), respectively. Logistic regression showed that LPTS (odds ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.42,  = .021) and MBA (odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.85,  = .001) were independent predictors. The area under the curve (AUC) of LPTS-MBA ratio was 0.69, greater than that of LPTS alone (AUC = 0.61) but lower than that for MBA (AUC = 0.82).

Conclusions: In this study, a reduced MBA was the strongest predictive variable associated with a primary ACL tear. A threshold of 22.35° of MBA was associated with an increased risk of ACL tear, with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 84%. A cut-off of 0.22 of LPTS-MBA was associated with an increased risk of ACL tear, with a sensitivity of 55% and specificity of 87%.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, case-control study.

Citing Articles

Three Morphological Risk Factors for Predicting Isolated Meniscal Bucket-handle Tear.

Gultekin M, Keskin Z, Arslan S, Dinc E, Dincel Y Indian J Orthop. 2024; 58(5):517-526.

PMID: 38694694 PMC: 11058177. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01124-4.

References
1.
Cotofana S, Eckstein F, Wirth W, Souza R, Li X, Wyman B . In vivo measures of cartilage deformation: patterns in healthy and osteoarthritic female knees using 3T MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(6):1127-35. PMC: 3088828. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2057-y. View

2.
Sauer S, English R, Clatworthy M . The Ratio of Tibial Slope and Meniscal Bone Angle for the Prediction of ACL Reconstruction Failure Risk. Surg J (N Y). 2018; 4(3):e152-e159. PMC: 6102115. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1668111. View

3.
Briggs K, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey W, Kocher M, Steadman J . The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37(5):890-7. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508330143. View

4.
Sturnick D, Vacek P, DeSarno M, Gardner-Morse M, Tourville T, Slauterbeck J . Combined anatomic factors predicting risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury for males and females. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(4):839-47. PMC: 6607022. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514563277. View

5.
Sousa Filho P, Marques A, Pereira L, Pigozzo B, Pires E Albuquerque R . Analysis of Posterior Tibial Slope as Risk Factor to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021; 56(1):47-52. PMC: 7895634. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712495. View