» Articles » PMID: 36572484

Deep Learning Using Multilayer Perception Improves the Diagnostic Acumen of Spirometry: a Single-centre Canadian Study

Overview
Date 2022 Dec 26
PMID 36572484
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Spirometry and plethysmography are the gold standard pulmonary function tests (PFT) for diagnosis and management of lung disease. Due to the inaccessibility of plethysmography, spirometry is often used alone but this leads to missed or misdiagnoses as spirometry cannot identify restrictive disease without plethysmography. We aimed to develop a deep learning model to improve interpretation of spirometry alone.

Methods: We built a multilayer perceptron model using full PFTs from 748 patients, interpreted according to international guidelines. Inputs included spirometry (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced mid-expiratory flow), plethysmography (total lung capacity, residual volume) and biometrics (sex, age, height). The model was developed with 2582 PFTs from 477 patients, randomly divided into training (80%), validation (10%) and test (10%) sets, and refined using 1245 previously unseen PFTs from 271 patients, split 50/50 as validation (136 patients) and test (135 patients) sets. Only one test per patient was used for each of 10 experiments conducted for each input combination. The final model was compared with interpretation of 82 spirometry tests by 6 trained pulmonologists and a decision tree.

Results: Accuracies from the first 477 patients were similar when inputs included biometrics+spirometry+plethysmography (95%±3%) vs biometrics+spirometry (90%±2%). Model refinement with the next 271 patients improved accuracies with biometrics+pirometry (95%±2%) but no change for biometrics+spirometry+plethysmography (95%±2%). The final model significantly outperformed (94.67%±2.63%, p<0.01 for both) interpretation of 82 spirometry tests by the decision tree (75.61%±0.00%) and pulmonologists (66.67%±14.63%).

Conclusions: Deep learning improves the diagnostic acumen of spirometry and classifies lung physiology better than pulmonologists with accuracies comparable to full PFTs.

Citing Articles

Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Restriction from Spirometry.

Moffett A, Balasubramanian A, McCormack M, Aysola J, Ungar L, Halpern S medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39802801 PMC: 11722487. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.02.25319890.


Prediction of xerostomia in elderly based on clinical characteristics and salivary flow rate with machine learning.

Lee Y, Won J, Auh Q, Noh Y, Lee S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3423.

PMID: 38341514 PMC: 10858905. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54120-x.


nPCA: a linear dimensionality reduction method using a multilayer perceptron.

Li J, Wang Y Front Genet. 2024; 14:1290447.

PMID: 38259616 PMC: 10800564. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1290447.

References
1.
Tang Y, Zhang M, Feng Y, Liang B . The measurement of lung volumes using body plethysmography and helium dilution methods in COPD patients: a correlation and diagnosis analysis. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:37550. PMC: 5120321. DOI: 10.1038/srep37550. View

2.
Ching T, Himmelstein D, Beaulieu-Jones B, Kalinin A, Do B, Way G . Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. J R Soc Interface. 2018; 15(141). PMC: 5938574. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0387. View

3.
Bhatt S, Bhakta N, Wilson C, Cooper C, Barjaktarevic I, Bodduluri S . New Spirometry Indices for Detecting Mild Airflow Obstruction. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):17484. PMC: 6269456. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35930-2. View

4.
Miller M, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A . Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005; 26(2):319-38. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805. View

5.
Stanojevic S, Kaminsky D, Miller M, Thompson B, Aliverti A, Barjaktarevic I . ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2021; 60(1). DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01499-2021. View