» Articles » PMID: 36569152

A Comparative Study of Gastric Histopathology Sub-size Image Classification: From Linear Regression to Visual Transformer

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Dec 26
PMID 36569152
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the world. At the same time, it is also the fourth most deadly cancer. Early detection of cancer exists as a guide for the treatment of gastric cancer. Nowadays, computer technology has advanced rapidly to assist physicians in the diagnosis of pathological pictures of gastric cancer. Ensemble learning is a way to improve the accuracy of algorithms, and finding multiple learning models with complementarity types is the basis of ensemble learning. Therefore, this paper compares the performance of multiple algorithms in anticipation of applying ensemble learning to a practical gastric cancer classification problem.

Methods: The complementarity of sub-size pathology image classifiers when machine performance is insufficient is explored in this experimental platform. We choose seven classical machine learning classifiers and four deep learning classifiers for classification experiments on the GasHisSDB database. Among them, classical machine learning algorithms extract five different image virtual features to match multiple classifier algorithms. For deep learning, we choose three convolutional neural network classifiers. In addition, we also choose a novel Transformer-based classifier.

Results: The experimental platform, in which a large number of classical machine learning and deep learning methods are performed, demonstrates that there are differences in the performance of different classifiers on GasHisSDB. Classical machine learning models exist for classifiers that classify Abnormal categories very well, while classifiers that excel in classifying Normal categories also exist. Deep learning models also exist with multiple models that can be complementarity.

Discussion: Suitable classifiers are selected for ensemble learning, when machine performance is insufficient. This experimental platform demonstrates that multiple classifiers are indeed complementarity and can improve the efficiency of ensemble learning. This can better assist doctors in diagnosis, improve the detection of gastric cancer, and increase the cure rate.

Citing Articles

Enhanced gastric cancer classification and quantification interpretable framework using digital histopathology images.

Zubair M, Owais M, Mahmood T, Iqbal S, Usman S, Hussain I Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22533.

PMID: 39342030 PMC: 11439054. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73823-9.


Gastric Cancer Image Classification: A Comparative Analysis and Feature Fusion Strategies.

Loddo A, Usai M, Di Ruberto C J Imaging. 2024; 10(8).

PMID: 39194984 PMC: 11355805. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10080195.


Sleep Stage Classification in Children Using Self-Attention and Gaussian Noise Data Augmentation.

Huang X, Shirahama K, Irshad M, Nisar M, Piet A, Grzegorzek M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(7).

PMID: 37050506 PMC: 10098613. DOI: 10.3390/s23073446.


EMDS-7: Environmental microorganism image dataset seventh version for multiple object detection evaluation.

Yang H, Li C, Zhao X, Cai B, Zhang J, Ma P Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1084312.

PMID: 36891388 PMC: 9986282. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1084312.


EBHI-Seg: A novel enteroscope biopsy histopathological hematoxylin and eosin image dataset for image segmentation tasks.

Shi L, Li X, Hu W, Chen H, Chen J, Fan Z Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1114673.

PMID: 36760405 PMC: 9902656. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1114673.

References
1.
Zheng X, Wang R, Zhang X, Sun Y, Zhang H, Zhao Z . A deep learning model and human-machine fusion for prediction of EBV-associated gastric cancer from histopathology. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):2790. PMC: 9120175. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30459-5. View

2.
Cheng J, Han Z, Mehra R, Shao W, Cheng M, Feng Q . Computational analysis of pathological images enables a better diagnosis of TFE3 Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):1778. PMC: 7156652. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15671-5. View

3.
. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14(2):101-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5. View

4.
Liu W, Li C, Rahaman M, Jiang T, Sun H, Wu X . Is the aspect ratio of cells important in deep learning? A robust comparison of deep learning methods for multi-scale cytopathology cell image classification: From convolutional neural networks to visual transformers. Comput Biol Med. 2021; 141:105026. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105026. View

5.
Fu B, Zhang M, He J, Cao Y, Guo Y, Wang R . StoHisNet: A hybrid multi-classification model with CNN and Transformer for gastric pathology images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022; 221:106924. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106924. View