» Articles » PMID: 36568680

Impact of Prone Positioning Duration on the Outcome of Patients Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2022 Dec 26
PMID 36568680
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Research has shown that prone positioning (PP) improves the survival of patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the reported impact of PP duration on the outcome of V-V ECMO patients with ARDS varies across studies.

Methods: A meta-analysis approach was used to identify studies that investigated the impact of PP duration on the outcome of ARDS patients who were treated with V-V ECMO; the following databases were used: MEDLINE, Embase, Wanfang, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The primary outcome was cumulative survival. Secondary outcomes were length of stay in an intensive care unit, exchange of arterial blood gases, and adverse events.

Results: A total of 8 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. Patients with longer duration of PP (≥12 h) had a longer survival period (risk ratio: 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.00, 1.54]) than those with PP < 12 h. There was no evidence of publication bias across the studies.

Conclusion: Our results imply that a longer duration of PP ≥ 12 h might improve the outcome of patients with ARDS who receive V-V ECMO therapy.

Citing Articles

Mapping knowledge structure and emerging trends of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a bibliometric and visualized study.

Lu Y, Li W, Qi S, Cheng K, Wu H Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1365864.

PMID: 39086955 PMC: 11288878. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1365864.


Effect of prone positioning on survival in adult patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled study.

Tong H, Pan F, Zhang X, Jia S, Vashisht R, Chen K J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(2):1368-1377.

PMID: 38505030 PMC: 10944719. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-1808.

References
1.
DerSimonian R, Laird N . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7(3):177-88. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. View

2.
Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard J, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T . Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(23):2159-68. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. View

3.
Leeflang M, Deeks J, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt P . Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149(12):889-97. PMC: 2956514. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008. View

4.
Gainnier M, Michelet P, Thirion X, Arnal J, Sainty J, Papazian L . Prone position and positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31(12):2719-26. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000094216.49129.4B. View

5.
Rilinger J, Zotzmann V, Bemtgen X, Schumacher C, Biever P, Duerschmied D . Prone positioning in severe ARDS requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):397. PMC: 7341706. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03110-2. View