» Articles » PMID: 36568090

Top 100 #PCOS Influencers: Understanding Who, Why and How Online Content for PCOS is Influenced

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2022 Dec 26
PMID 36568090
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: With the exponential increase in digital space of social media platforms, a new group called social media influencers are driving online content of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) which eventually influences behaviour and decision-making process. The objective of this study was to identify the top 100 social media (Twitter) influencers and organizations from across the globe who are advocating for PCOS. We further explored the origin and journey of these social media influencers.

Methods: We identified the top 100 PCOS influencers and organizations between July and August 2022 using three social network analysis tools- Cronycle, Symplur and SocioViz. These influencers were invited to a semi-structured interview to explore why they chose to become an influencer and the support they have to deliver their online content. Two independent authors coded the anonymised transcripts from these interviews and broad themes were identified by thematic inductive analysis.

Results: 95.0% of individual influencers and 80% of organisations are from high-income countries. Most influencers in our study agree that social media is an essential tool in the present day to raise awareness of PCOS. However, they reiterated social media also has significant disadvantages that require consideration and caution. Most influencers were driven by poor personal experience and worked voluntarily to reduce misinformation and improve the experiences of women diagnosed with PCOS in the future. Although there is an interest in working together, there is currently minimal collaborative work between influencers.

Conclusion: There is a global inequity of #PCOS influencers online. Establishing standards and support based on evidence may help develop more influencers, especially in low- and middle-income countries, so we can counter misinformation and provide locally acceptable guidance.

Citing Articles

Rethinking the Terminology: A Perspective on Renaming Polycystic Ovary Syndrome for an Enhanced Pathophysiological Understanding.

Taieb A, Asma G, Jabeur M, Fatma B, Nassim B, Asma B Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2024; 17:11795514241296777.

PMID: 39494232 PMC: 11528641. DOI: 10.1177/11795514241296777.


Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Internet of Things: A Scoping Review.

Graca S, Alloh F, Lagojda L, Dallaway A, Kyrou I, Randeva H Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(16).

PMID: 39201229 PMC: 11354210. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12161671.


Reducing the Gap in Knowledge and Expectations between Clinicians and People with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome or Adrenal Conditions: Simulation via Instant Messaging-Birmingham Advance: Patient and Public Involvement (SIMBA-PPI) Study.

Melson E, Rezai F, Pan C, Ng S, Ogiliev T, Blendis E BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):784.

PMID: 39039479 PMC: 11265159. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05772-w.


Assessment of the quality, content, and reliability of YouTube® videos on diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review with cross-sectional analysis comparing peer-reviewed videos.

Ali Baig S, Malhotra K, Banerjee A, Kowsik M, Kumar K, Rahman F Endocr Connect. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38856005 PMC: 11227060. DOI: 10.1530/EC-24-0059.


Mapping automatic social media information disorder. The role of bots and AI in spreading misleading information in society.

Tomassi A, Falegnami A, Romano E PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303183.

PMID: 38820281 PMC: 11142451. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303183.


References
1.
Varady N, Chandawarkar A, Kernkamp W, Gans I . Who should you be following? The top 100 social media influencers in orthopaedic surgery. World J Orthop. 2019; 10(9):327-338. PMC: 6766466. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i9.327. View

2.
Chung A, Vieira D, Donley T, Tan N, Jean-Louis G, Kiely Gouley K . Adolescent Peer Influence on Eating Behaviors via Social Media: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(6):e19697. PMC: 8212626. DOI: 10.2196/19697. View

3.
Kempegowda P, Melson E, Manolopoulos K, Arlt W, OReilly M . Implicating androgen excess in propagating metabolic disease in polycystic ovary syndrome. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 11:2042018820934319. PMC: 7315669. DOI: 10.1177/2042018820934319. View

4.
Pilgrim K, Bohnet-Joschko S . Selling health and happiness how influencers communicate on Instagram about dieting and exercise: mixed methods research. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):1054. PMC: 6683418. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7387-8. View

5.
Chandawarkar A, Gould D, Stevens W . The Top 100 Social Media Influencers in Plastic Surgery on Twitter: Who Should You Be Following?. Aesthet Surg J. 2018; 38(8):913-917. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjy024. View