» Articles » PMID: 36560943

Comparison of -specific Antibody Cut-offs for the Diagnosis of Aspergillosis

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 Dec 23
PMID 36560943
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: diseases are frequently encountered in patients who are immunocompromised. Without a prompt diagnosis, the clinical consequences may be lethal. -specific antibodies have been widely used to facilitate the diagnosis of diseases. To date, universally standardized cut-off values have not been established. This study aimed to investigate the cut-off values of -specific antibodies and perform a narrative review to depict the geographic differences in the Taiwanese population.

Methods: We analyzed enrolled 118 healthy controls, 29 patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA), chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA), and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) and 99 with disease control, who were tested for and -specific IgG and IgE using ImmunoCAP. 99 participants not fulfilling the diagnosis of IA, CPA, and ABPA were enrolled in the disease control group. The duration of retrieval of medical records from June 2018 to September 2021. Optimal cut-offs and association were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.

Results: We found that patients with CPA had the highest -specific IgG levels while patients with ABPA had the highest -specific IgE, and -specific IgG and IgE levels. In patients with CPA and ABPA, the optimal cut-offs of -specific IgG and -specific IgG levels were 41.6, 40.8, 38.1, and 69.9 mgA/l, respectively. Geographic differences in the cut-off values of -specific IgG were also noted. Specifically, the levels were different in eco-climatic zones.

Conclusion: We identified the optimal cut-offs of -specific antibodies to facilitate a precise diagnosis of aspergillosis. The observed geographic differences of the antibody levels suggest that an eco-climatic-specific reference is needed to facilitate a prompt and accurate diagnosis of aspergillosis.

Citing Articles

Seroprevalence and prognostic value of Aspergillus-specific IgG among non-neutropenic invasive pulmonary aspergillosis patients: a prospective multicenter study.

Lee M, Chang H, Chen Y, Liu C, Keng L, Huang H Pneumonia (Nathan). 2024; 16(1):28.

PMID: 39497226 PMC: 11536880. DOI: 10.1186/s41479-024-00154-8.


Chronic pulmonary Aspergillosis in a patient with poorly controlled diabetes: A case report and literatures review.

Chuang T, Fu P Respirol Case Rep. 2024; 12(1):e01283.

PMID: 38282720 PMC: 10811610. DOI: 10.1002/rcr2.1283.


Comparison of diagnostic efficiency of detecting IgG and IgE with immunoassay method in diagnosing ABPA: a meta-analysis.

Liu A, Chen W, Wei Y, Liang J, Liao S, Chen Y BMC Pulm Med. 2023; 23(1):374.

PMID: 37798745 PMC: 10557217. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02620-3.

References
1.
Jabeen K, Farooqi J, Iqbal N, Wahab K, Irfan M . and -Specific IgG Cut-Offs for the Diagnosis of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Pakistan. J Fungi (Basel). 2020; 6(4). PMC: 7711809. DOI: 10.3390/jof6040249. View

2.
Barton R, Hobson R, Denton M, Peckham D, Brownlee K, Conway S . Serologic diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with cystic fibrosis through the detection of immunoglobulin G to Aspergillus fumigatus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008; 62(3):287-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.06.018. View

3.
Al-Rahman M, Al Kindi M, Kutty I, Al-Kalbani I, Alshekaili J . Determination of an -Specific Immunoglobulin G Reference Range in an Adult Omani Population. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2018; 18(1):e43-e46. PMC: 5892812. DOI: 10.18295/squmj.2018.18.01.007. View

4.
Agarwal R, Aggarwal A, Sehgal I, Dhooria S, Behera D, Chakrabarti A . Performance of serum galactomannan in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2015; 58(7):408-12. DOI: 10.1111/myc.12334. View

5.
Jat K, Vaidya P, Mathew J, Jondhale S, Singh M . Childhood allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Lung India. 2018; 35(6):499-507. PMC: 6219146. DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_216_18. View