» Articles » PMID: 36557022

Comparative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Dec 23
PMID 36557022
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effectiveness of radical prostatectomy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer is controversial owing to an increased complication rate and treatment-related morbidity. With technical advances and refinements in surgical techniques, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has improved the outcomes of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. RARP therefore plays a role in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer. In this study, we enrolled a total of 76 patients with pathologic stage pT3a, pT3b, pT4, or pN1. All patients were followed from surgery to June 2022, and their characteristics, perioperative outcomes, complications, adjuvant therapies and outcomes were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 69 years, and the initial PSA level was 20.5 (IQR 10.8-31.6) ng/mL. The median operative time was 205 (IQR 182-241) minutes. Sixty-six patients (86.8%) regained continence within 1 year, and the continence rate within 3 years of follow-up was 90.8% (69 patients). The overall survival rate was 100%. Twenty-two patients had BCR, of whom 13 received salvage androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), 2 received salvage external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone, and 7 received combined ADT and EBRT. No patient had disease progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer during a median 36 months of follow-up after salvage therapy. Our results suggest that RARP can also decrease tumor burden and allow for accurate and precise pathological staging with the need for subsequent treatment. Therefore, we recommend that RARP represents a well-standardized, safe, and oncologically effective option for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

Real‑world retrospective study of early‑stage prostate cancer at a Portuguese Comprehensive Cancer Centre: The PEarlC study.

Braga I, Goncalves-Monteiro S, Calisto R, Rangel M, Medeiros E, Cunha J Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(2):362.

PMID: 38895053 PMC: 11184360. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14495.

References
1.
Stephenson A, Kattan M, Eastham J, Bianco Jr F, Yossepowitch O, Vickers A . Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(26):4300-5. PMC: 3651598. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2501. View

2.
Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, Rider J, Taari K, Busch C . Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(10):932-42. PMC: 4118145. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311593. View

3.
Djokic M, Radic T, Santric V, Dragicevic D, Suvakov S, Mihailovic S . The Association of Polymorphisms in Genes Encoding Antioxidant Enzymes GPX1 (rs1050450), SOD2 (rs4880) and Transcriptional Factor Nrf2 (rs6721961) with the Risk and Development of Prostate Cancer. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(10). PMC: 9611982. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58101414. View

4.
Schaeffer E, Srinivas S, Antonarakis E, Armstrong A, Bekelman J, Cheng H . NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19(2):134-143. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008. View

5.
Nazim S, Abbas F . Role of Surgery in locally advanced prostate cancer. Pak J Med Sci. 2015; 31(3):710-6. PMC: 4485300. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.313.7103. View