» Articles » PMID: 36555801

Effect of Superovulation Treatment on Oocyte's DNA Methylation

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Dec 23
PMID 36555801
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Controlled ovarian stimulation is a necessary step in some assisted reproductive procedures allowing a higher collection of female gametes. However, consequences of this stimulation for the gamete or the offspring have been shown in several mammals. Most studies used comparisons between oocytes from different donors, which may contribute to different responses. In this work, we use the bovine model in which each animal serves as its own control. DNA methylation profiles were obtained by single-cell whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of oocytes from pre-ovulatory unstimulated follicles compared to oocytes from stimulated follicles. Results show that the global percentage of methylation was similar between groups, but the percentage of methylation was lower for non-stimulated oocytes in the imprinted genes APEG3, MEG3, and MEG9 and higher in TSSC4 when compared to stimulated oocytes. Differences were also found in CGI of imprinted genes: higher methylation was found among non-stimulated oocytes in MEST (PEG1), IGF2R, GNAS (SCG6), KvDMR1 ICR UMD, and IGF2. In another region around IGF2, the methylation percentage was lower for non-stimulated oocytes when compared to stimulated oocytes. Data drawn from this study might help to understand the molecular reasons for the appearance of certain syndromes in assisted reproductive technologies-derived offspring.

Citing Articles

Effects of multisuperovulation on the transcription and genomic methylation of oocytes and offspring.

Xie J, Wang Q, Chen Y, Tang S, Sun H, Ge Z Clin Epigenetics. 2024; 16(1):135.

PMID: 39342274 PMC: 11439255. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-024-01746-3.


Cardiovascular health of offspring conceived by assisted reproduction technology: a comprehensive review.

Li J, Liu Y, Huang H, Jin L Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1287060.

PMID: 38292241 PMC: 10824981. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1287060.

References
1.
La Marca A, Sunkara S . Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 20(1):124-40. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmt037. View

2.
Tomizawa S, Kobayashi H, Watanabe T, Andrews S, Hata K, Kelsey G . Dynamic stage-specific changes in imprinted differentially methylated regions during early mammalian development and prevalence of non-CpG methylation in oocytes. Development. 2011; 138(5):811-20. PMC: 3035086. DOI: 10.1242/dev.061416. View

3.
Kalra S, Ratcliffe S, Coutifaris C, Molinaro T, Barnhart K . Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118(4):863-71. PMC: 3178887. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822be65f. View

4.
Senapati S, Wang F, Ord T, Coutifaris C, Feng R, Mainigi M . Superovulation alters the expression of endometrial genes critical to tissue remodeling and placentation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35(10):1799-1808. PMC: 6150905. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1244-z. View

5.
Pavlok A, Lucas-Hahn A, Niemann H . Fertilization and developmental competence of bovine oocytes derived from different categories of antral follicles. Mol Reprod Dev. 1992; 31(1):63-7. DOI: 10.1002/mrd.1080310111. View