» Articles » PMID: 36555747

Urine Molecular Biomarkers for Detection and Follow-Up of Small Renal Masses

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS) is the best strategy for small renal masses (SRMs) management; however, reliable methods for early detection and disease aggressiveness prediction are urgently needed. The aim of the present study was to validate DNA methylation biomarkers for non-invasive SRM detection and prognosis. The levels of methylated genes , , , , and were evaluated in 165 serial urine samples prospectively collected from 39 patients diagnosed with SRM, specifically renal cell carcinoma (RCC), before and during the AS via quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Voided urine samples from 92 asymptomatic volunteers were used as the control. Significantly higher methylated , , , and levels and/or frequencies were detected in SRM patients' urine samples as compared to the control. The highest diagnostic power (AUC = 0.74) was observed for the four biomarkers panel with 92% sensitivity and 52% specificity. Methylated level positively correlated with SRM size at diagnosis, while had the opposite effect and was related to SRM progression. To sum up, SRMs contribute significantly to the amount of methylated DNA detectable in urine, which might be used for very early RCC detection. Moreover, and methylation have the potential to be prognostic biomarkers for SRMs.

Citing Articles

Detection and Validation of Organic Metabolites in Urine for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Diagnosis.

Holbrook K, Quaye G, Noriega Landa E, Su X, Gao Q, Williams H Metabolites. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39452927 PMC: 11509871. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14100546.

References
1.
Grant O, Wang Y, Kumari M, Zabet N, Schalkwyk L . Characterising sex differences of autosomal DNA methylation in whole blood using the Illumina EPIC array. Clin Epigenetics. 2022; 14(1):62. PMC: 9107695. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-022-01279-7. View

2.
Park S, Park B, Kim C, Kwon G . Ultrasound-guided core biopsy of small renal masses: diagnostic rate and limitations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012; 24(1):90-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.09.007. View

3.
Di Meo A, Batruch I, Brown M, Yang C, Finelli A, Jewett M . Searching for prognostic biomarkers for small renal masses in the urinary proteome. Int J Cancer. 2019; 146(8):2315-2325. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32650. View

4.
Sohlberg E, Metzner T, Leppert J . The Harms of Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Patients with Small Renal Masses: A Mini-review. Eur Urol Focus. 2019; 5(6):943-945. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.03.006. View

5.
Turajlic S, Xu H, Litchfield K, Rowan A, Horswell S, Chambers T . Deterministic Evolutionary Trajectories Influence Primary Tumor Growth: TRACERx Renal. Cell. 2018; 173(3):595-610.e11. PMC: 5938372. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.043. View