The Future Is Coming: Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Infertility Could Improve Assisted Reproduction Outcomes-The Value of Regulatory Frameworks

Overview

Journal Diagnostics (Basel)

Specialty Radiology

Date 2022 Dec 23

PMID 36552986

Authors

Sanja Medenica

Dusan Zivanovic

Ljubica Batkoska

Susanna Marinelli

Giuseppe Basile

Antonio Perino

Gaspare Cucinella

Giuseppe Gullo

Simona Zaami

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Infertility is a global health issue affecting women and men of reproductive age with increasing incidence worldwide, in part due to greater awareness and better diagnosis. Assisted reproduction technologies (ART) are considered the ultimate step in the treatment of infertility. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has been progressively used in the many fields of medicine, integrating knowledge and computer science through machine learning algorithms. AI has the potential to improve infertility diagnosis and ART outcomes estimated as pregnancy and/or live birth rate, especially with recurrent ART failure. A broad-ranging review has been conducted, focusing on clinical AI applications up until September 2022, which could be estimated in terms of possible applications, such as ultrasound monitoring of folliculogenesis, endometrial receptivity, embryo selection based on quality and viability, and prediction of post implantation embryo development, in order to eliminate potential contributing risk factors. Oocyte morphology assessment is highly relevant in terms of successful fertilization rate, as well as during oocyte freezing for fertility preservation, and substantially valuable in oocyte donation cycles. AI has great implications in the assessment of male infertility, with computerised semen analysis systems already in use and a broad spectrum of possible AI-based applications in environmental and lifestyle evaluation to predict semen quality. In addition, considerable progress has been made in terms of harnessing AI in cases of idiopathic infertility, to improve the stratification of infertile/fertile couples based on their biological and clinical signatures. With AI as a very powerful tool of the future, our review is meant to summarise current AI applications and investigations in contemporary reproduction medicine, mainly focusing on the nonsurgical aspects of it; in addition, the authors have briefly explored the frames of reference and guiding principles for the definition and implementation of legal, regulatory, and ethical standards for AI in healthcare.

Citing Articles

Prediction of pregnancy outcomes in women with systemic lupus erythematosus before pregnancy: Application of machine learning models.

Paydar K, Sheikhtaheri A Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):e42679.

PMID: 40040993 PMC: 11876896. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42679.

The era of increasing cancer survivorship: Trends in fertility preservation, medico-legal implications, and ethical challenges.

De Paola L, Napoletano G, Gullo G, Circosta F, Vergallo G, Marinelli S Open Med (Wars). 2025; 20(1):20251144.

PMID: 39958979 PMC: 11826245. DOI: 10.1515/med-2025-1144.

Artificial Intelligence in IVF Laboratories: Elevating Outcomes Through Precision and Efficiency.

Hew Y, Kutuk D, Duzcu T, Ergun Y, Basar M Biology (Basel). 2025; 13(12.

PMID: 39765654 PMC: 11727220. DOI: 10.3390/biology13120988.

Artificial intelligence and sexual reproductive health and rights: a technological leap towards achieving sustainable development goal target 3.7.

Gbagbo F, Ameyaw E, Yaya S Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):196.

PMID: 39716281 PMC: 11667899. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01924-9.

Advanced KPI framework for IVF pregnancy prediction models in IVF protocols.

Sergeev S, Diakova I Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29477.

PMID: 39604481 PMC: 11603023. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80759-7.

References

Amann J, Blasimme A, Vayena E, Frey D, Madai V . Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020; 20(1):310. PMC: 7706019. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6. View

Jakubczyk P, Paja W, Pancerz K, Cebulski J, Depciuch J, Uzun O . Determination of idiopathic female infertility from infrared spectra of follicle fluid combined with gonadotrophin levels, multivariate analysis and machine learning methods. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022; 38:102883. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102883. View

Huang T, Kosasa T, Walker B, Arnett C, Huang C, Yin C . Deep learning neural network analysis of human blastocyst expansion from time-lapse image files. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021; 42(6):1075-1085. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.02.015. View

Keskinbora K . Medical ethics considerations on artificial intelligence. J Clin Neurosci. 2019; 64:277-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.03.001. View

Broughton D, Moley K . Obesity and female infertility: potential mediators of obesity's impact. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107(4):840-847. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.017. View

Sahoo A, Kumar Y . Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods. Technol Health Care. 2014; 22(4):531-45. DOI: 10.3233/THC-140816. View

Chen F, De Neubourg D, Debrock S, Peeraer K, DHooghe T, Spiessens C . Selecting the embryo with the highest implantation potential using a data mining based prediction model. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016; 14:10. PMC: 4776393. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-016-0145-1. View

DAlton M, Breslin N . Management of multiple gestations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020; 150(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13168. View

Moon A, Garofalo J, Koirala P, Vu M, Chuang L . Robotic Surgery in Gynecology. Surg Clin North Am. 2020; 100(2):445-460. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.007. View

10.

Afnan M, Liu Y, Conitzer V, Rudin C, Mishra A, Savulescu J . Interpretable, not black-box, artificial intelligence should be used for embryo selection. Hum Reprod Open. 2021; 2021(4):hoab040. PMC: 8687137. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab040. View

11.

Franik S, Le Q, Kremer J, Kiesel L, Farquhar C . Aromatase inhibitors (letrozole) for ovulation induction in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 9:CD010287. PMC: 9514207. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010287.pub4. View

12.

Bori L, Paya E, Alegre L, Viloria T, Remohi J, Naranjo V . Novel and conventional embryo parameters as input data for artificial neural networks: an artificial intelligence model applied for prediction of the implantation potential. Fertil Steril. 2020; 114(6):1232-1241. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.023. View

13.

Vaegter K, Ghukasyan Lakic T, Olovsson M, Berglund L, Brodin T, Holte J . Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF/ICSI single-embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107(3):641-648.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.005. View

14.

Zhang C, Chen C, Wang J, Wang Y, Wen S, Cao Y . An endometrial receptivity scoring system basing on the endometrial thickness, volume, echo, peristalsis, and blood flow evaluated by ultrasonography. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:907874. PMC: 9395662. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.907874. View

15.

Goudakou M, Kalogeraki A, Matalliotakis I, Panagiotidis Y, Gullo G, Prapas Y . Cryptic sperm defects may be the cause for total fertilization failure in oocyte donor cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 24(2):148-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.10.011. View

16.

Petersen B, Boel M, Montag M, Gardner D . Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(10):2231-44. PMC: 5027927. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew188. View

17.

Raef B, Maleki M, Ferdousi R . Computational prediction of implantation outcome after embryo transfer. Health Informatics J. 2019; 26(3):1810-1826. DOI: 10.1177/1460458219892138. View

18.

Kirkegaard K, Agerholm I, Ingerslev H . Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(5):1277-85. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des079. View

19.

Gambadauro P, Navaratnarajah R . Reporting of embryo transfer methods in IVF research: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 30(2):137-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.10.013. View

20.

Gadalla M, Norman R, Tay C, Hiam D, Melder A, Pundir J . Medical and Surgical Treatment of Reproductive Outcomes in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Int J Fertil Steril. 2019; 13(4):257-270. PMC: 6875858. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2020.5608. View