» Articles » PMID: 36552133

MRI-Based Personalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhance the Upper Limb Function in Patients with Stroke: Study Protocol for a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Dec 23
PMID 36552133
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to have the potential to improve the motor recovery of the affected upper limbs in patients with stroke, and recently, several optimized tDCS methods have been proposed to magnify its effectiveness. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of personalized tDCS using brain MRI-based electrical field simulation and optimization, to enhance motor recovery of the upper limbs in the patients. This trial is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in the subacute to chronic rehabilitation phase. Forty-two adult stroke patients with unilateral upper limb involvement will be randomly allocated to three groups: (1) personalized tDCS with MRI-based electrical field simulation and optimized stimulation, (2) conventional tDCS with bihemispheric stimulation of the primary motor cortex, and (3) sham tDCS. All three groups will undergo 10 intervention sessions with 30 min of 2-mA intensity stimulation, during a regular upper limb rehabilitation program over two weeks. The primary outcome measure for the motor recovery of the upper limb impairment is the Fugl-Meyer assessment for the upper extremity score at the end of the intervention, and the secondary measures include changes in the motor evoked potentials, the frequency power and coherence of the electroencephalography, performance in activities of daily living, and adverse events with a 1-month follow-up assessment. The primary outcome will be analyzed on the intention-to-treat principle. There is a paucity of studies regarding the effectiveness of personalized and optimized tDCS that considers individual brain lesions and electrical field characteristics in the real world. No feasibility or pivotal studies have been performed in stroke patients using brain MRI, to determine a lesion-specific tDCS simulation and optimization that considers obstacles in the segmentation and analysis of the affected brain tissue, such as ischemic and hemorrhagic lesions. This trial will contribute to addressing the effectiveness and safety of personalized tDCS, using brain MRI-based electrical field simulation and optimization, to enhance the motor recovery of the upper limbs in patients with stroke.

Citing Articles

The Optimized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With Simulation Using MRI.

Yoon M, Lim S Brain Neurorehabil. 2024; 17(3):e21.

PMID: 39649712 PMC: 11621673. DOI: 10.12786/bn.2024.17.e21.


The integrity of thalamo-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex tract: a key factor in residual consciousness in disorders of consciousness patients.

Jung J, Yoo Y, Yoon M, Hong B, Kim T, Park G Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1373750.

PMID: 39206298 PMC: 11349516. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1373750.


Molecular Changes in the Ischemic Brain as Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Targets-TMS and tDCS Mechanisms, Therapeutic Challenges, and Combination Therapies.

Markowska A, Tarnacka B Biomedicines. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39062133 PMC: 11274560. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12071560.


Safety and feasibility of optimized transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: a multicenter study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Kim T, Kang D, Salazar Fajardo J, Jang H, Um Y, Kim S Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1356073.

PMID: 38660096 PMC: 11040101. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1356073.


Electric field simulation and appropriate electrode positioning for optimized transcranial direct current stimulation of stroke patients: an in Silico model.

Yoon M, Park H, Yoo Y, Oh H, Im S, Kim T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2850.

PMID: 38310134 PMC: 10838316. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52874-y.


References
1.
Shinde A, Lerud K, Munsch F, Alsop D, Schlaug G . Effects of tDCS dose and electrode montage on regional cerebral blood flow and motor behavior. Neuroimage. 2021; 237:118144. PMC: 8653867. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118144. View

2.
Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim I, Di Bella P, Johnson G . Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005; 19(4):404-11. DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa. View

3.
Lee K, Kim J, Hong B, Lim S . Clinical recovery from stroke lesions and related outcomes. J Clin Neurosci. 2016; 37:79-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.11.008. View

4.
Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell J . Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7(3):468-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003. View

5.
Datta A, Baker J, Bikson M, Fridriksson J . Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient. Brain Stimul. 2011; 4(3):169-74. PMC: 3142347. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2010.11.001. View