» Articles » PMID: 36548188

The Effect of Trunk Position on Attentional Disengagement in Unilateral Spatial Neglect

Overview
Journal Neurol Int
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Dec 22
PMID 36548188
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) causes difficulties in disengaging attention from the right side to unexpected targets on the left. However, the relationship between egocentric spatial position and attentional disengagement remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the relationship between trunk position and attentional disengagement. Thirty-eight patients with early stroke onset were classified as follows: USN (n = 18), right brain damage without USN (n = 10), and left brain damage (n = 10). The primary outcome was reaction time (RT) in the modified Posner task (MPT). The MPT comprised a condition in which the preceding cue and target direction were the same (valid condition) and a condition in which the directions were opposite (invalid condition). RT to the target was calculated. The MPT was performed in three different trunk positions (trunk midline, left, and right). In each group, the RT was compared on the basis of the stimulus conditions and trunk position. The RT was delayed in the valid and invalid left conditions, especially in the invalid left condition. The RT of the trunk right condition was significantly reduced compared with that of trunk midline and left conditions in the invalid left condition. Thus, trunk position influences attentional disengagement. This study contributes to the rehabilitation of patients with neglect symptoms.

References
1.
Posner M, Walker J, Friedrich F, Rafal R . Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci. 1984; 4(7):1863-74. PMC: 6564871. View

2.
Chen P, Hreha K, Fortis P, Goedert K, Barrett A . Functional assessment of spatial neglect: a review of the Catherine Bergego scale and an introduction of the Kessler foundation neglect assessment process. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012; 19(5):423-35. PMC: 3445290. DOI: 10.1310/tsr1905-423. View

3.
Rorden C, Li D, Karnath H . Biased temporal order judgments in chronic neglect influenced by trunk position. Cortex. 2018; 99:273-280. PMC: 5801144. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.008. View

4.
Kincade J, Abrams R, Astafiev S, Shulman G, Corbetta M . An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(18):4593-604. PMC: 6725019. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0236-05.2005. View

5.
Chica A, Bartolomeo P, Lupianez J . Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention. Behav Brain Res. 2012; 237:107-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.027. View