» Articles » PMID: 36547509

Do Domain Knowledge and Retrieval Practice Predict Students' Study Order Decisions?

Overview
Journal J Intell
Date 2022 Dec 22
PMID 36547509
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Learning complex concepts is necessary for student success, but it is often challenging. Learning such concepts can be influenced by students' study order choices during learning to switch to a new category (interleaved study order) or stay within the same category (blocked study order). Students often prefer stay decisions during learning and make relatively few switch decisions; however, an open question is whether students' switch decisions are related to their level of prior knowledge in the domain and the learning strategy they use (retrieval practice versus study). To examine these relationships, we recruited undergraduate students from an introductory geology course. Prior to the course modules on rock classification, students self-rated their knowledge, took a prior knowledge test, classified rock exemplars by completing study or retrieval practice trials, and made study order choices. Students then completed assignments and attended lectures in their geology course on igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks. Next, students self-rated their knowledge, took a new prior knowledge test, completed study or retrieval practice trials, made study order decisions, took final classification tests, and self-reported beliefs about study order choices. Even though students' knowledge increased after course modules on rock identification, and most students believed that domain knowledge impacts study decisions, prior knowledge did not predict students' switch decisions. In contrast, students who completed retrieval practice trials made substantially more switch decisions (i.e., interleaved study) than did students who completed study trials.

Citing Articles

Emerging Trends in Research on Self-Regulated Learning and Implications for Education: An Introduction to the Special Issue.

Tauber S, Ariel R J Intell. 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 36976145 PMC: 10053219. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence11030052.

References
1.
Nosofsky R, Sanders C, Meagher B, Douglas B . Toward the development of a feature-space representation for a complex natural category domain. Behav Res Methods. 2017; 50(2):530-556. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0884-8. View

2.
Middlebrooks C, Castel A . Self-regulated learning of important information under sequential and simultaneous encoding conditions. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017; 44(5):779-792. PMC: 5932263. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000480. View

3.
Brunmair M, Richter T . Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators. Psychol Bull. 2019; 145(11):1029-1052. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000209. View

4.
Kang S, McDaniel M, Pashler H . Effects of testing on learning of functions. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011; 18(5):998-1005. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0113-x. View

5.
Metcalfe J, Kornell N, Son L . A cognitive-science based programme to enhance study efficacy in a high and low risk setting. Eur J Cogn Psychol. 2011; 19(4-5):743-768. PMC: 2626191. DOI: 10.1080/09541440701326063. View