» Articles » PMID: 36543445

Differential Improvement in Angina And Health-Related Quality of Life After PCI in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2022 Dec 21
PMID 36543445
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: An increase in fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improvement in angina. Coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns (focal vs diffuse) influence the FFR change after stenting and may predict angina relief.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the differential improvement in patient-reported outcomes after PCI in focal and diffuse CAD as defined by the pullback pressure gradient (PPG).

Methods: This is a subanalysis of the TARGET-FFR (Trial of Angiography vs. pressure-Ratio-Guided Enhancement Techniques-Fractional Flow Reserve) randomized clinical trial. The 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) was administered at baseline and 3 months after PCI. The PPG index was calculated from manual pre-PCI FFR pullbacks. The median PPG value was used to define focal and diffuse CAD. Residual angina was defined as an SAQ-7 score <100.

Results: A total of 103 patients were analyzed. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics between patients with focal and diffuse CAD. Focal disease had larger increases in FFR after PCI than patients with diffuse disease (0.30 ± 0.14 vs 0.19 ± 0.12; P < 0.001). Patients with focal disease who underwent PCI for focal CAD had significantly higher SAQ-7 summary scores at follow-up than those with diffuse CAD (87.1 ± 20.3 vs 75.6 ± 24.4; mean difference = 11.5 [95% CI: 2.8-20.3]; P = 0.01). After PCI, residual angina was present in 39.8% but was significantly less in those with treated focal CAD (27.5% vs 51.9%; P = 0.020).

Conclusions: Residual angina after PCI was almost twice as common in patients with a low PPG (diffuse disease), whereas patients with a high PPG (focal disease) reported greater improvement in angina and quality of life. The baseline pattern of CAD can predict the likelihood of angina relief. (Trial of Angiography vs. pressure-Ratio-Guided Enhancement Techniques-Fractional Flow Reserve [TARGET-FFR]; NCT03259815).

Citing Articles

The pressure wire holds its ground: the debacle of QFR.

Collet C, Ikeda K, Mizukami T EuroIntervention. 2025; 21(3):e143-e144.

PMID: 39901637 PMC: 11776402. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00001.


Prognostic Value of Postpercutaneous Coronary Intervention Murray-Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio: Post Hoc Analysis From FLAVOUR Trial.

Ding D, Zhang J, Wu P, Wang Z, Shi H, Yu W JACC Asia. 2025; 5(1):59-70.

PMID: 39886193 PMC: 11775804. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.10.019.


Acupuncture for angina post percutaneous coronary intervention: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhou X, Li Y, Yin Y, Wang Y, Xie W, Ren Y BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e090964.

PMID: 39719277 PMC: 11667460. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090964.


Coronary angiography: a review of the state of the art and the evolution of angiography in cardio therapeutics.

Gurav A, Revaiah P, Tsai T, Miyashita K, Tobe A, Oshima A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1468888.

PMID: 39654943 PMC: 11625592. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1468888.


Coronary Physiology to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Why, When, and How.

Escaned J, Petraco R, Fearon W J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 3(9):102198.

PMID: 39575212 PMC: 11576379. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102198.