» Articles » PMID: 36542998

Bottled Water Contaminant Exposures and Potential Human Effects

Abstract

Background: Bottled water (BW) consumption in the United States and globally has increased amidst heightened concern about environmental contaminant exposures and health risks in drinking water supplies, despite a paucity of directly comparable, environmentally-relevant contaminant exposure data for BW. This study provides insight into exposures and cumulative risks to human health from inorganic/organic/microbial contaminants in BW.

Methods: BW from 30 total domestic US (23) and imported (7) sources, including purified tapwater (7) and spring water (23), were analyzed for 3 field parameters, 53 inorganics, 465 organics, 14 microbial metrics, and in vitro estrogen receptor (ER) bioactivity. Health-benchmark-weighted cumulative hazard indices and ratios of organic-contaminant in vitro exposure-activity cutoffs were assessed for detected regulated and unregulated inorganic and organic contaminants.

Results: 48 inorganics and 45 organics were detected in sampled BW. No enforceable chemical quality standards were exceeded, but several inorganic and organic contaminants with maximum contaminant level goal(s) (MCLG) of zero (no known safe level of exposure to vulnerable sub-populations) were detected. Among these, arsenic, lead, and uranium were detected in 67 %, 17 %, and 57 % of BW, respectively, almost exclusively in spring-sourced samples not treated by advanced filtration. Organic MCLG exceedances included frequent detections of disinfection byproducts (DBP) in tapwater-sourced BW and sporadic detections of DBP and volatile organic chemicals in BW sourced from tapwater and springs. Precautionary health-based screening levels were exceeded frequently and attributed primarily to DBP in tapwater-sourced BW and co-occurring inorganic and organic contaminants in spring-sourced BW.

Conclusion: The results indicate that simultaneous exposures to multiple drinking-water contaminants of potential human-health concern are common in BW. Improved understandings of human exposures based on more environmentally realistic and directly comparable point-of-use exposure characterizations, like this BW study, are essential to public health because drinking water is a biological necessity and, consequently, a high-vulnerability vector for human contaminant exposures.

Citing Articles

Colorimetric sensor array for sensitive detection and identification of bacteria based on the etching of triangular silver nanoparticles regulated by Cl at various concentrations.

Liu S, Yan P, Naveed S, Zhu Y, Fu T, Wu R Mikrochim Acta. 2024; 192(1):2.

PMID: 39621163 DOI: 10.1007/s00604-024-06855-7.


Point-of-use chlorine residuals and disinfection byproduct occurrences in rural households served by public water utilities in Appalachian Virginia.

Rasheduzzaman M, OConnell B, Krometis L, Brown T, Cohen A J Water Health. 2024; 22(6):1064-1074.

PMID: 38935457 DOI: 10.2166/wh.2024.054.


Juxtaposition of intensive agriculture, vulnerable aquifers, and mixed chemical/microbial exposures in private-well tapwater in northeast Iowa.

Bradley P, Kolpin D, Thompson D, Romanok K, Smalling K, Breitmeyer S Sci Total Environ. 2023; 868:161672.

PMID: 36657670 PMC: 9976626. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161672.

References
1.
Knobeloch L, Gorski P, Christenson M, Anderson H . Private drinking water quality in rural Wisconsin. J Environ Health. 2013; 75(7):16-20. View

2.
COHN M, Waggoner R, McClatchy J . The 7H11 medium for the cultivation of mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1968; 98(2):295-6. DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1968.98.2.295. View

3.
Ball J, McCleskey R . A new cation-exchange method for accurate field speciation of hexavalent chromium. Talanta. 2008; 61(3):305-13. DOI: 10.1016/S0039-9140(03)00282-0. View

4.
Blackwell B, Ankley G, Corsi S, DeCicco L, Houck K, Judson R . An "EAR" on Environmental Surveillance and Monitoring: A Case Study on the Use of Exposure-Activity Ratios (EARs) to Prioritize Sites, Chemicals, and Bioactivities of Concern in Great Lakes Waters. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(15):8713-8724. PMC: 6132252. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01613. View

5.
Foreman W, Williams T, Furlong E, Hemmerle D, Stetson S, Jha V . Comparison of detection limits estimated using single- and multi-concentration spike-based and blank-based procedures. Talanta. 2021; 228:122139. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122139. View