» Articles » PMID: 36540070

Effect of CSR Contribution Timing During COVID-19 Pandemic on Consumers' Prepayment Purchase Intentions: Evidence from Hospitality Industry in China

Overview
Date 2022 Dec 21
PMID 36540070
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) contributions are essential for hospitality companies during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about how CSR contribution timing during the pandemic might affect consumers' prepayment purchase intentions. This paper takes a hospitality company as an example, using two experiments to explore (a) the effect of CSR contribution timing on consumers' prepayment purchase intentions and (b) the potential roles of psychological contracts and distance to the COVID-19 risk center. Study 1 demonstrated that CSR contributions during the COVID-19 outbreak (vs. after its peak) led consumers to have higher prepayment purchase intentions, revealing the impact of CSR contribution timing. This effect was also driven by psychological contracts between consumers and the hospitality company. Study 2 showed that, when participants were in the peripheral area of a COVID-19 outbreak, CSR contributions during the outbreak (vs. after its peak) increased prepayment purchase intentions whereas the opposite effect occurred when consumers were in the risk center.

Citing Articles

The effect of hotel employee resilience during COVID-19: The moderation role of perceived risk and challenge stressors.

Xie C, Zhang J, Chen Y, Morrison A Tour Manag Perspect. 2023; 46:101087.

PMID: 36741920 PMC: 9886732. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101087.


Formation mechanism of the quarantine hotel booking intention of potential consumers.

Wu G, Wang Y, Li X, Lin M Front Psychol. 2022; 13:997667.

PMID: 36248485 PMC: 9555081. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997667.


How Duty-Free Policy Influences Travel Intention: Mediating Role of Perceived Value and Moderating Roles of COVID-19 Severity and Counterfactual Thinking.

Xu Y, Ma W, Xu X, Xie Y Front Psychol. 2022; 13:908736.

PMID: 35783792 PMC: 9247605. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908736.


COVID-19 research in management: An updated bibliometric analysis.

Hashemi H, Rajabi R, Brashear-Alejandro T J Bus Res. 2022; 149:795-810.

PMID: 35669095 PMC: 9159974. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.082.


The Impact of Consumer Purchase Behavior Changes on the Business Model Design of Consumer Services Companies Over the Course of COVID-19.

Tao H, Sun X, Liu X, Tian J, Zhang D Front Psychol. 2022; 13:818845.

PMID: 35310236 PMC: 8927628. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.818845.

References
1.
Ferrante D, Girotto V, Straga M, Walsh C . Improving the past and the future: a temporal asymmetry in hypothetical thinking. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012; 142(1):23-7. DOI: 10.1037/a0027947. View

2.
Camerer C, Mobbs D . Differences in Behavior and Brain Activity during Hypothetical and Real Choices. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016; 21(1):46-56. PMC: 7769501. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.001. View

3.
Islam M, Ferdous M, Potenza M . Panic and generalized anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic among Bangladeshi people: An online pilot survey early in the outbreak. J Affect Disord. 2020; 276:30-37. PMC: 7362838. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.049. View

4.
Li S, Rao L, Bai X, Zheng R, Ren X, Li J . Progression of the "Psychological Typhoon Eye" and variations since the Wenchuan earthquake. PLoS One. 2010; 5(3):e9727. PMC: 2840028. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009727. View

5.
Bishara A, Pleskac T, Fridberg D, Yechiam E, Lucas J, Busemeyer J . Similar Processes Despite Divergent Behavior in Two Commonly Used Measures of Risky Decision Making. J Behav Decis Mak. 2011; 22(4):435-454. PMC: 3152830. DOI: 10.1002/bdm.641. View