EUS-FNA for Solid Lesions: An Idea Whose Time Has Passed?
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
de Moura D, McCarty T, Jirapinyo P, Ribeiro I, Hathorn K, Madruga-Neto A
. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses. Endosc Int Open. 2020; 8(6):E738-E747.
PMC: 7247894.
DOI: 10.1055/a-1122-8674.
View
2.
Mangiavillano B, Frazzoni L, Togliani T, Fabbri C, Tarantino I, De Luca L
. Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges. Endosc Int Open. 2021; 9(6):E901-E906.
PMC: 8159577.
DOI: 10.1055/a-1395-7129.
View
3.
Adler D, Muthusamy V, Ehrlich D, Parasher G, Thosani N, Chen A
. A multicenter evaluation of a new EUS core biopsy needle: Experience in 200 patients. Endosc Ultrasound. 2018; 8(2):99-104.
PMC: 6482605.
DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_53_17.
View
4.
Elhanafi S, Mahmud N, Vergara N, Kochman M, Das K, Ginsberg G
. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound tissue acquisition methods for genomic analysis of pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 34(5):907-913.
PMC: 6497552.
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14540.
View
5.
Gkolfakis P, Crino S, Tziatzios G, Ramai D, Papaefthymiou A, Papanikolaou I
. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022; 95(6):1067-1077.e15.
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.01.019.
View