» Articles » PMID: 36536413

On Usage of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Mortality During and Post-pregnancy: a Systematic Review of Literature

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Dec 19
PMID 36536413
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Care during pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium are fundamental to avoid pathologies for the mother and her baby. However, health issues can occur during this period, causing misfortunes, such as the death of the fetus or neonate. Predictive models of fetal and infant deaths are important technological tools that can help to reduce mortality indexes. The main goal of this work is to present a systematic review of literature focused on computational models to predict mortality, covering stillbirth, perinatal, neonatal, and infant deaths, highlighting their methodology and the description of the proposed computational models.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of literature, limiting the search to the last 10 years of publications considering the five main scientific databases as source.

Results: From 671 works, 18 of them were selected as primary studies for further analysis. We found that most of works are focused on prediction of neonatal deaths, using machine learning models (more specifically Random Forest). The top five most common features used to train models are birth weight, gestational age, sex of the child, Apgar score and mother's age. Having predictive models for preventing mortality during and post-pregnancy not only improve the mother's quality of life, as well as it can be a powerful and low-cost tool to decrease mortality ratios.

Conclusion: Based on the results of this SRL, we can state that scientific efforts have been done in this area, but there are many open research opportunities to be developed by the community.

Citing Articles

Explore the factors related to the death of offspring under age five and appraise the hazard of child mortality using machine learning techniques in Bangladesh.

Rahman A, Rahman M BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):360.

PMID: 39881228 PMC: 11776272. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21460-w.


Bridging Data Gaps: Predicting Sub-national Maternal Mortality Rates in Kenya Using Machine Learning Models.

Mwaura H, Kamanu T, Kulohoma B Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72476.

PMID: 39600732 PMC: 11590391. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72476.


Advances in AI and machine learning for predictive medicine.

Sharma A, Lysenko A, Jia S, Boroevich K, Tsunoda T J Hum Genet. 2024; 69(10):487-497.

PMID: 38424184 PMC: 11422165. DOI: 10.1038/s10038-024-01231-y.


Machine learning models based on clinical indices and cardiotocographic features for discriminating asphyxia fetuses-Porto retrospective intrapartum study.

Ribeiro M, Nunes I, Castro L, Costa-Santos C, Henriques T Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1099263.

PMID: 37033082 PMC: 10074982. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1099263.

References
1.
Hoodbhoy Z, Hasan B, Jehan F, Bijnens B, Chowdhury D . Machine learning from fetal flow waveforms to predict adverse perinatal outcomes: a study protocol. Gates Open Res. 2018; 2:8. PMC: 5974597. DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12796.1. View

2.
Sheikhtaheri A, Zarkesh M, Moradi R, Kermani F . Prediction of neonatal deaths in NICUs: development and validation of machine learning models. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021; 21(1):131. PMC: 8056638. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01497-8. View

3.
Mboya I, Mahande M, Mohammed M, Obure J, Mwambi H . Prediction of perinatal death using machine learning models: a birth registry-based cohort study in northern Tanzania. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(10):e040132. PMC: 7574940. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040132. View

4.
McLeod J, Menon A, Matusko N, Weiner G, Gadepalli S, Barks J . Comparing mortality risk models in VLBW and preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Perinatol. 2020; 40(5):695-703. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-020-0650-0. View

5.
Ushida T, Moriyama Y, Nakatochi M, Kobayashi Y, Imai K, Nakano-Kobayashi T . Antenatal prediction models for short- and medium-term outcomes in preterm infants. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021; 100(6):1089-1096. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14136. View