» Articles » PMID: 36532895

[Ranking of Immunization Programs in Latin America, 2019Ranking Dos Programas De Imunização Na América Latina, 2019]

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Dec 19
PMID 36532895
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To establish a ranking of national immunization programs in Latin America that compares the various realities, identifies challenges and unachieved goals, and encourages countries to search for strategies to overcome the obstacles they face.

Methods: Ten countries with the most innovative national vaccination schedules (NVCs) were selected. Information published on official websites of ministries of health, the World Health Organization (WHO), the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) were used, as well as interviews with experts from each country. A ranking was constructed, based on domains linked to the 2019 NVC (vaccinations given at different life stages, influenza vaccination, and vaccination in special situations); vaccination coverage in 2018; and programmatic aspects.

Results: The general ranking is led by Chile and Panama, due to vaccination in the first and second year of life. They are followed by Argentina, Uruguay, and Costa Rica, which stand out for vaccination of other groups, influenza vaccination, and programmatic aspects. Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico have more delays in their NVCs, as well as programmatic gaps and lower vaccination coverages. Finally, Paraguay and Peru have similar deficiencies and bigger information gaps. However, when the domains are analyzed individually, the ranking changes and the same pattern is not repeated.

Conclusions: This is the first ranking of national immunization programs in Latin America that highlights strengths and weaknesses in each country. The periodicity of this exercise will be key when comparing the evolution and positioning of these programs over time.

Citing Articles

[Ranking of immunization programs in Latin America, 2020 dos programas de vacinação na América Latina, 2020].

Rombini M, Mauas R, Katz N, Uruena A Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2024; 48:e15.

PMID: 38464876 PMC: 10921906. DOI: 10.26633/RPSP.2024.15.


Report of the Influenza Vaccination Program in Mexico (2006-2022) and Proposals for Its Improvement.

Romero-Feregrino R, Romero-Cabello R, Rodriguez-Leon M, Rocha-Rocha V, Romero-Feregrino R, Munoz-Cordero B Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(11).

PMID: 38006018 PMC: 10675656. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11111686.

References
1.
Bae J, Curtis L, Hernandez A . National Hospital Quality Rankings: Improving the Value of Information in Hospital Rating Systems. JAMA. 2020; 324(9):839-840. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.11165. View

2.
Arndt S, Acion L, Caspers K, Blood P . How reliable are county and regional health rankings?. Prev Sci. 2013; 14(5):497-502. PMC: 8335645. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-012-0320-3. View

3.
Papagiannis D, Malli F, Gourgoulianis K . Registry Systems for COVID-19 Vaccines and Rate of Acceptability for Vaccination Before and After Availability of Vaccines in 12 Countries: A Narrative Review. Infect Dis Rep. 2022; 14(1):121-133. PMC: 8872397. DOI: 10.3390/idr14010016. View

4.
Duclos P . National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs): guidance for their establishment and strengthening. Vaccine. 2010; 28 Suppl 1:A18-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.027. View

5.
Hull B, Deeks S, McIntyre P . The Australian Childhood Immunisation Register-A model for universal immunisation registers?. Vaccine. 2009; 27(37):5054-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.06.056. View