» Articles » PMID: 3653222

A Comparison of Nine Calcium Ion Antagonists and Propranolol: Exercise Tolerance, Heart Rate and ST-segment Changes in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina Pectoris

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1987 Jan 1
PMID 3653222
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effects of nine calcium ion antagonists on exercise tolerance, heart rate and ST-segment changes were compared with those of propranolol in two hundred and eighty patients with established chronic stable angina pectoris. These patients participated in clinical trials for anti-anginal efficacy against placebo, using identical methods and similar protocols, but the comparison reported here was retrospective. The trials were all fixed dose, and the dose was determined by previous upward titration to arrive at an average maximal tolerance level. All the drugs except prenylamine increased the exercise tolerance significantly when compared with placebo. Maximal ST-segment depression on exercise was reduced during treatment with propranolol while treatment with the calcium ion antagonists had no significant effect. The time to the development of 1 mm ST-segment depression was prolonged by all the drugs. Nifedipine, PY-108-068 and nicardipine increased the resting heart rate whereas verapamil, diltiazem, gallopamil, KB-944, prenylamine and tiapamil produced a slight reduction. Propranolol produced a highly significant reduction in the resting and maximal heart rates and the rate-pressure product, whereas gallopamil increased the rate-pressure product by +8% and prenylamine reduced it by -10%. At the doses used, diltiazem, gallopamil and verapamil produced a greater increase in exercise tolerance than did propranolol, while the other drugs were inferior. None of the calcium ion antagonists matched the increase in the time taken to develop 1 mm ST-segment depression with propranolol, although the results with verapamil and gallopamil were close. The calcium ion antagonists are effective antianginal agents which produce their effects by mechanisms which are very different to the beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agents.

Citing Articles

Withdrawal of prenylamine: perspectives on pharmacological, clinical and regulatory outcomes following the first QT-related casualty.

Shah R, Stonier P Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018; 9(8):475-493.

PMID: 30364900 PMC: 6199680. DOI: 10.1177/2042098618780854.


Hemodynamic effects of intravenous elgodipine in coronary artery disease during rest and exercise, and basic pharmacokinetic parameters.

Silke B, de la Motte S, Spiers P, Herity N, Drake M, Kelly J Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1996; 10(5):573-80.

PMID: 8950073 DOI: 10.1007/BF00050999.


Gallopamil. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in ischaemic heart disease.

Brogden R, Benfield P Drugs. 1994; 47(1):93-115.

PMID: 7510624 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199447010-00007.


Calcium channel antagonists. Part II: Use and comparative properties of the three prototypical calcium antagonists in ischemic heart disease, including recommendations based on an analysis of 41 trials.

Opie L Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1988; 1(5):461-91.

PMID: 3154677 DOI: 10.1007/BF02125731.

References
1.
Opie L . Drugs and the heart. III. Calcium antagonists. Lancet. 1980; 1(8172):806-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91303-3. View

2.
Henry P . Comparative pharmacology of calcium antagonists: nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem. Am J Cardiol. 1980; 46(6):1047-58. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90366-5. View

3.
Gould B, Mann S, Kieso H, Subramanian V, Raftery E . The 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure profile with verapamil. Circulation. 1982; 65(1):22-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.65.1.22. View

4.
Hof R . Calcium antagonist and the peripheral circulation: differences and similarities between PY 108-068, nicardipine, verapamil and diltiazem. Br J Pharmacol. 1983; 78(2):375-94. PMC: 2044696. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1983.tb09403.x. View

5.
Campeau L . Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation. 1976; 54(3):522-3. View