» Articles » PMID: 36530466

That Was Not What I Was Aiming At! Differentiating Human Intent and Outcome in a Physically Dynamic Throwing Task

Overview
Journal Auton Robots
Date 2022 Dec 19
PMID 36530466
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recognising intent in collaborative human robot tasks can improve team performance and human perception of robots. Intent can differ from the observed outcome in the presence of mistakes which are likely in physically dynamic tasks. We created a dataset of 1227 throws of a ball at a target from 10 participants and observed that 47% of throws were mistakes with 16% completely missing the target. Our research leverages facial images capturing the person's reaction to the outcome of a throw to predict when the resulting throw is a mistake and then we determine the actual intent of the throw. The approach we propose for outcome prediction performs 38% better than the two-stream architecture used previously for this task on front-on videos. In addition, we propose a 1D-CNN model which is used in conjunction with priors learned from the frequency of mistakes to provide an end-to-end pipeline for outcome and intent recognition in this throwing task.

References
1.
Chicco D, Jurman G . The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21(1):6. PMC: 6941312. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7. View

2.
Liu J, Shahroudy A, Perez M, Wang G, Duan L, Kot A . NTU RGB+D 120: A Large-Scale Benchmark for 3D Human Activity Understanding. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2019; 42(10):2684-2701. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2916873. View

3.
Shotton J, Girshick R, Fitzgibbon A, Sharp T, Cook M, Finocchio M . Efficient human pose estimation from single depth images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2013; 35(12):2821-40. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.241. View

4.
Kraut R, Olson J, Banaji M, Bruckman A, Cohen J, Couper M . Psychological research online: report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. Am Psychol. 2004; 59(2):105-17. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105. View

5.
Zou J, Schiebinger L . AI can be sexist and racist - it's time to make it fair. Nature. 2018; 559(7714):324-326. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-05707-8. View