» Articles » PMID: 36527074

Rehabilitation and Outcomes After Complicated Vs Uncomplicated Mild TBI: Results from the CENTER-TBI Study

Abstract

Background: Despite existing guidelines for managing mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), evidence-based treatments are still scarce and large-scale studies on the provision and impact of specific rehabilitation services are needed. This study aimed to describe the provision of rehabilitation to patients after complicated and uncomplicated mTBI and investigate factors associated with functional outcome, symptom burden, and TBI-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) up to six months after injury.

Methods: Patients (n = 1379) with mTBI from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study who reported whether they received rehabilitation services during the first six months post-injury and who participated in outcome assessments were included. Functional outcome was measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale - Extended (GOSE), symptom burden with the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), and HRQOL with the Quality of Life after Brain Injury - Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS). We examined whether transition of care (TOC) pathways, receiving rehabilitation services, sociodemographic (incl. geographic), premorbid, and injury-related factors were associated with outcomes using regression models. For easy comparison, we estimated ordinal regression models for all outcomes where the scores were classified based on quantiles.

Results: Overall, 43% of patients with complicated and 20% with uncomplicated mTBI reported receiving rehabilitation services, primarily in physical and cognitive domains. Patients with complicated mTBI had lower functional level, higher symptom burden, and lower HRQOL compared to uncomplicated mTBI. Rehabilitation services at three or six months and a higher number of TOC were associated with unfavorable outcomes in all models, in addition to pre-morbid psychiatric problems. Being male and having more than 13 years of education was associated with more favorable outcomes. Sustaining major trauma was associated with unfavorable GOSE outcome, whereas living in Southern and Eastern European regions was associated with lower HRQOL.

Conclusions: Patients with complicated mTBI reported more unfavorable outcomes and received rehabilitation services more frequently. Receiving rehabilitation services and higher number of care transitions were indicators of injury severity and associated with unfavorable outcomes. The findings should be interpreted carefully and validated in future studies as we applied a novel analytic approach.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02210221.

Citing Articles

Integrating Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, Compassion-Focused Therapy with Cognitive Retraining in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Report.

Mahajan S, Jain A, Chattopadhyay S, Themse S Consort Psychiatr. 2025; 5(4):93-104.

PMID: 39980623 PMC: 11839219. DOI: 10.17816/CP15546.


Predicting recovery in patients with mild traumatic brain injury and a normal CT using serum biomarkers and diffusion tensor imaging (CENTER-TBI): an observational cohort study.

Richter S, Winzeck S, Correia M, Czeiter E, Whitehouse D, Kornaropoulos E EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 75:102751.

PMID: 39720677 PMC: 11667275. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102751.


Health care costs and service utilization in the first year following moderate to severe traumatic injury.

Rasmussen M, Zhang Y, Andelic N, Aas E BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1535.

PMID: 39627835 PMC: 11616367. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12016-6.


Traumatic brain injury: molecular biomarkers, genetics, secondary consequences, and medical management.

Lipsky R, Witkin J, Shafique H, Smith J, Cerne R, Marini A Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1446076.

PMID: 39450122 PMC: 11500614. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1446076.


Harnessing Artificial Neural Networks for Spinal Cord Injury Prognosis.

Tamburella F, Lena E, Mascanzoni M, Iosa M, Scivoletto G J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15).

PMID: 39124769 PMC: 11313443. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154503.


References
1.
Maas A, Menon D, Steyerberg E, Citerio G, Lecky F, Manley G . Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI): a prospective longitudinal observational study. Neurosurgery. 2014; 76(1):67-80. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000575. View

2.
Graff H, Siersma V, Moller A, Kragstrup J, Andersen L, Egerod I . Labour market attachment after mild traumatic brain injury: nationwide cohort study with 5-year register follow-up in Denmark. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(4):e026104. PMC: 6500196. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026104. View

3.
Baker S, ONeill B, HADDON Jr W, Long W . The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974; 14(3):187-96. View

4.
Steinbuechel N, Wilson L, Gibbons H, Muehlan H, Schmidt H, Schmidt S . QOLIBRI overall scale: a brief index of health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012; 83(11):1041-7. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302361. View

5.
van der Vlegel M, Polinder S, Mikolic A, Kaplan R, Steinbuechel N, Plass A . The Association of Post-Concussion and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms with Health-Related Quality of Life, Health Care Use and Return-to-Work after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(11). PMC: 8199686. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112473. View