» Articles » PMID: 36526919

The Evaluation of a Digital Health Intervention to Improve Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Recommendation Practices of Medical Students

Overview
Journal J Cancer Educ
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Dec 16
PMID 36526919
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated what is being taught about HPV in US medical schools and evaluated a digital health intervention for medical students to increase their intention to provide a high-quality HPV vaccine recommendation. An online survey was emailed to Academic Deans at the 124 accredited US Schools of Medicine and Osteopathic Medicine between February and April 2018. A digital educational module was emailed to medical students in June 2020. A single-subject longitudinal study design was employed. Pre- post-survey administration measured change in knowledge, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and intention to recommend HPV vaccine. Gaps in medical school curricula were found. Very few schools (~ 9%) reported teaching content on HPV prevention strategies or patient education. For the digital intervention, independent and dependent variables increased positively. Perceived behavioral control improved at significant levels as participants felt more confident addressing parents' concerns about the vaccine (p < 0.001) and more confident recommending the vaccine for patients (p < 0.05) post module. On the pre-survey, only 6% of the sample knew the most effective HPV vaccine communication style and on the post-survey 81% correctly identified it (p < 0.001). The intervention increased HPV and HPV vaccine knowledge, self-efficacy, and intention to provide a high-quality HPV vaccine recommendation to patients.

Citing Articles

Vaccine hesitancy educational interventions for medical students: A systematic narrative review in western countries.

White P, Alberti H, Rowlands G, Tang E, Gagnon D, Dube E Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024; 20(1):2397875.

PMID: 39323010 PMC: 11441049. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2397875.


Digital Gamification Tools to Enhance Vaccine Uptake: Scoping Review.

Hakim H, Michelle Driedger S, Gagnon D, Chevrier J, Roch G, Dube E JMIR Serious Games. 2024; 12:e47257.

PMID: 38421688 PMC: 10906656. DOI: 10.2196/47257.

References
1.
Senkomago V, Henley S, Thomas C, Mix J, Markowitz L, Saraiya M . Human Papillomavirus-Attributable Cancers - United States, 2012-2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019; 68(33):724-728. PMC: 6705893. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6833a3. View

2.
Ylitalo K, Lee H, Mehta N . Health care provider recommendation, human papillomavirus vaccination, and race/ethnicity in the US National Immunization Survey. Am J Public Health. 2012; 103(1):164-9. PMC: 3518336. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300600. View

3.
Moss J, Gilkey M, Rimer B, Brewer N . Disparities in collaborative patient-provider communication about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016; 12(6):1476-83. PMC: 4964667. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1128601. View

4.
Fenton A, Eun T, Clark J, Perkins R . Indicated or elective? The association of providers' words with HPV vaccine receipt. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018; 14(10):2503-2509. PMC: 6284477. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1480237. View

5.
Opel D, Heritage J, Taylor J, Mangione-Smith R, Salas H, DeVere V . The architecture of provider-parent vaccine discussions at health supervision visits. Pediatrics. 2013; 132(6):1037-46. PMC: 3838535. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-2037. View