» Articles » PMID: 36525233

Retrospective Evaluation of the Impact of Dose Escalation Using Pre-operative Simultaneous Integrated Boost Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy on the Outcome of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluating the outcome of pre-operative simultaneous integrated boost volumetric modulated arc therapy (SIB-VMAT) concomitant with capecitabine in patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, during the period January 2013-December 2019.

Results: A total of 134 patients were enrolled. The median age at diagnosis was 59 years. All patients received pre-operative concurrent chemo-radiation therapy (CCRT) using SIB-VMAT with oral capecitabine. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered prior to CCRT in 32 patients (23.9%). The dose of radiation was 55 Gy in 94 patients (70.1%), while 40 patients (29.9%) received 50 Gy. All patients completed the CCRT treatment without breaks. No records of acute and late grade III and IV toxicities. Curative surgery was performed in all patients with a median interval of 11 (6-52) weeks between the end of CCRT and the date of surgery. No reported 30-day postoperative mortality and no grade III and IV Clavien-Dindo complications. PCR was reported in 26 patients (19.4%), while pathologically negative nodes (pN0) were achieved in 103 patients (76.9%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was utilized in 57 patients (42.5%). The 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were 93.2%, 67.1%, and 87.3%, respectively. Only tumor regression grade (TRG) was significantly correlated with LRFS, (p value 0.043). On multivariate analysis, only TRG and achievement of pN0 were significantly correlated with DFS (p value < 0.001).

Conclusion: Dose escalation utilization (SIB-VMAT) in the pre-operative treatment of LARC is well tolerated and provides effective local control.

References
1.
Almatroudi A . The Incidence Rate of Colorectal Cancer in Saudi Arabia: An Observational Descriptive Epidemiological Analysis. Int J Gen Med. 2020; 13:977-990. PMC: 7605625. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S277272. View

2.
Roeder F, Meldolesi E, Gerum S, Valentini V, Rodel C . Recent advances in (chemo-)radiation therapy for rectal cancer: a comprehensive review. Radiat Oncol. 2020; 15(1):262. PMC: 7656724. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01695-0. View

3.
Deng Y, Chi P, Lan P, Wang L, Chen W, Cui L . Modified FOLFOX6 With or Without Radiation Versus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin With Radiation in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Initial Results of the Chinese FOWARC Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Three-Arm Phase III.... J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(27):3300-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.6198. View

4.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):205-13. PMC: 1360123. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. View

5.
Ryan R, Gibbons D, Hyland J, Treanor D, White A, Mulcahy H . Pathological response following long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Histopathology. 2005; 47(2):141-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02176.x. View